Stone, crushed and broken (except granite or limestone), mining and/or beneficiating · Texas

Acrosa Crushed Concrete

Grand Prairie, TX · ~74 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
4.3
Avg TCR
1.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Acrosa Crushed Concrete runs at 224% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Stone, crushed and broken (except granite or limestone), mining and/or beneficiating workplace, earning a grade F.

Acrosa Crushed Concrete: 4.3 TCR = 224% of Stone, crushed and broken (except granite or limestone), mining and/or beneficiating BLS 1.9 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Acrosa Crushed Concrete safety composite

Acrosa Crushed Concrete scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Acrosa Crushed Concrete: 4.0 → 4.5 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 4.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.64× in 2021

Acrosa Crushed Concrete's TCR rose 0.5 from 4.0 in 2020 to 4.5 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 0.64× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 212319 · Grand Prairie, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 4.3 · 224% of ind

  • DART 2.7 DART
  • RANK #4/4
  • PHOTO Ione Plant
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~74 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ione Plant (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Acrosa Crushed Concrete in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Acrosa Crushed Concrete averages 4.3 TCR (224% of the Stone, crushed and broken (except granite or limestone), mining and/or beneficiating BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Acrosa Crushed Concrete TCR series: 2020=4 · 2021=4.5 · BLS 1.9

Where Acrosa Crushed Concrete falls in its industry

15 Stone, crushed and broken (exc establishments

Safer than 27% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 4 Stone, crushed and broken (exc employers in Texas.

Acrosa Crushed Concrete (74 employees, TCR 4.3) among 8 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 75 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Allied Demolition, IncMilestone MaterialsMassillon Materials, Inc.Ione PlantCherry Crushed Concrete, Inc.MackvilleElementisBeaverton QuarryAcrosa Crushed Concrete
Acrosa Crushed Concrete (74 employees, TCR 4.3) among 8 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 75 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Acrosa Crushed Concrete has fewer employees than the Stone, crushed and broken (except granit median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 4.5 2.7 5 0 0
2020 4.0 4.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

212319 · TX · Grand Prairie

15 Stone, crushed and broken (except granite or limestone), mining and/or beneficiating employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 405 employers in Grand Prairie, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ione Plant 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR River City Stone 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Beaverton Quarry 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Milestone Materials 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Tolk Station-124 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ft. Bend Service Center CP18 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bluebonnet Electric Cooperative, Inc. - Headquarters and Corporate Services 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lon C Hill Service Center 74 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation Grand Prairie Campus (1435) 3,544 FTE
CITY-NEAR Poly-America, L.P. 2,377 FTE
CITY-NEAR Poly America 2,318 FTE
CITY-NEAR Inmar - 4355 Grand Prairie, TX 1,200 FTE
NAT-TCR FAY 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR VPI Phoenix 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Amalie Oil Company Tampa 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Subaru of America, Inc. 4.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE CRI - Ohio Living 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Crosby Excavating, Inc 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE ASB 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Frisbie Memorial Hospital-POM 74 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.