Continuing care retirement communities · Pennsylvania

ACTS Retirement-Life Communities-Lima Estates

Media, PA · ~134 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

ACTS Retirement-Life Communities-Lima Estates runs at 180% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Continuing care retirement communities workplace, earning a grade D.

ACTS Retirement-Life Communities-Lima Estates: 6.8 TCR = 180% of Continuing care retirement communities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

ACTS Retirement-Life Communities-Lima Estates safety composite

ACTS Retirement-Life Communities-Lima Estates scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 59% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

ACTS Retirement-Life Communities-Lima Estates: 2.7 → 4.2 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 13.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0.36× in 2022

ACTS Retirement-Life Communities-Lima Estates's TCR rose 1.5 from 2.7 in 2019 to 4.2 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 13.7 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.36× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Media, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.8 · 180% of ind

  • DART 2.5 DART
  • RANK #125/257
  • PHOTO Westminster Towers O…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~134 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Westminster Towers Orlando (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

ACTS Retirement-Life Communities-Lima Estates in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows ACTS Retirement-Life Communities-Lima Estates averages 6.8 TCR (180% of the Continuing care retirement communities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

ACTS Retirement-Life Communities-Lima Estates TCR series: 2019=2.7 · 2020=13.7 · 2022=4.2 · BLS 3.8

Where ACTS Retirement-Life Communities-Lima Estates falls in its industry

4,127 Continuing care retirement com establishments

Safer than 50% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #125 safest of 257 Continuing care retirement com employers in Pennsylvania.

ACTS Retirement-Life Communities-Lima Estates (134 employees, TCR 6.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate ACTS Retirement-Life Communities-Lima Estates
ACTS Retirement-Life Communities-Lima Estates (134 employees, TCR 6.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

ACTS Retirement-Life Communities-Lima Estates has more employees than the Continuing care retirement communities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 4.2 2.5 3 2 0
2020 13.7 10.3 4 16 0
2019 2.7 1.3 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · PA · Media

4,127 Continuing care retirement communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 67 employers in Media, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Westminster Towers Orlando 6.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Belmont Village Sunnyvale 6.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Parkvue Place 6.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mesa Grande Senior Living dba The Citadel Assisted Living 6.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE MARSA Inc. 134 FTE
STATE-SIZE Home ReNu 134 FTE
STATE-SIZE east coast hoist inc 134 FTE
STATE-SIZE Elverson Whitford 134 FTE
CITY-NEAR Riddle Hospital 1,213 FTE
CITY-NEAR ACTS Retirement-Life Communities - Granite Farms Estates 319 FTE
CITY-NEAR WAWA SITE - Dairy 267 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wesley Enhanced Living Main Line 265 FTE
NAT-TCR 6400-SWY-0017-0017-01566 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR South Health and Rehabilitation, LLC 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 334830-Maple Shade Po 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 232916-Edgewater Po 6.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Big Y Foods, Inc. Palmer 134 FTE
NAT-SIZE Big Y Foods, Inc. Monroe 134 FTE
NAT-SIZE AMCOR Tobacco packaging Richmond 134 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brewster Home Fashions, LLC 134 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.