General warehousing and storage · California

Acuity Brands Lighting, WRMDC

Ontario, CA · ~215 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
8.4
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Acuity Brands Lighting, WRMDC runs at 145% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical General warehousing and storage workplace, earning a grade D.

Acuity Brands Lighting, WRMDC: 8.4 TCR = 145% of General warehousing and storage BLS 5.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Acuity Brands Lighting, WRMDC safety composite

Acuity Brands Lighting, WRMDC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

22/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Acuity Brands Lighting, WRMDC: 7.0 → 8.1 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 10.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.9× in 2024

Acuity Brands Lighting, WRMDC's TCR rose 1.1 from 7.0 in 2021 to 8.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 10.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.9× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Ontario, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 8.4 · 145% of ind

  • DART 7.6 DART
  • RANK #906/1131
  • PHOTO VA Warehousing - 01
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 55 inj
  • SIZE ~215 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: VA Warehousing - 01 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Acuity Brands Lighting, WRMDC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Acuity Brands Lighting, WRMDC averages 8.4 TCR (145% of the General warehousing and storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Acuity Brands Lighting, WRMDC TCR series: 2021=7 · 2022=10.2 · 2024=8.1 · BLS 5.8

Where Acuity Brands Lighting, WRMDC falls in its industry

9,477 General warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 13% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #906 safest of 1131 General warehousing and storag employers in California.

Acuity Brands Lighting, WRMDC (215 employees, TCR 8.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Acuity Brands Lighting, WRMDC
Acuity Brands Lighting, WRMDC (215 employees, TCR 8.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Acuity Brands Lighting, WRMDC has more employees than the General warehousing and storage median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.1 7.6 17 0 0
2022 10.2 7.7 20 0 0
2021 7.0 7.0 18 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · CA · Ontario

9,477 General warehousing and storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 599 employers in Ontario, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR VA Warehousing - 01 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tyler Distribution Centers, Inc. 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6050 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aberdeen (Old Philadelphia Road) 8.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Camarillo 215 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wonderful Orchards-Eastside 215 FTE
STATE-SIZE 622 SAN MARCOS 215 FTE
STATE-SIZE YC Trucking 215 FTE
CITY-NEAR Prime Healthcare Services Inc. Location: St. Mary's, Passaic LLC 46-3499370 (HP29) 10,997 FTE
CITY-NEAR CAONA - ONTARIO HUB 4,372 FTE
CITY-NEAR ONTARIO HUB (CAONA) 3,354 FTE
CITY-NEAR Atlantic Solutions Group Inc, Inc. DBA Empire Workforce Solutions 3,240 FTE
NAT-TCR Spectrum Home Health 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Heat Treating Services Plant 3 North 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Casa de Esperanza de los Ninos 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Solid Surfaces NY Rochester 8.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - DNH2 215 FTE
NAT-SIZE Prime Now LLC - UMN1 215 FTE
NAT-SIZE Manufacturing Plant, Destileria Serralles Inc 215 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - DTG5 215 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.