Grading construction sites · New Jersey

Adamsville Maintenance, Inc.

Hillsborough, NJ · ~31 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Adamsville Maintenance, Inc. runs at 100% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Grading construction sites workplace, earning a grade C.

Adamsville Maintenance, Inc.: 2.8 TCR = 100% of Grading construction sites BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Adamsville Maintenance, Inc. safety composite

Adamsville Maintenance, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 28%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.2

2016→2024

Adamsville Maintenance, Inc. injury rate improved

Adamsville Maintenance, Inc.'s TCR fell 2.2 from 4.8 in 2016 to 2.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 9.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.92× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.8 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=4.4 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=9.5 · 2021=3.9 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=2.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238910 · Hillsborough, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.8 · 100% of ind

  • DART 2.6 DART
  • RANK #19/33
  • PHOTO Eberle Materials Inc.
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Eberle Materials Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Adamsville Maintenance, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Adamsville Maintenance, Inc. averages 2.8 TCR (100% of the Grading construction sites BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Adamsville Maintenance, Inc. TCR series: 2016=4.8 · 2017=0 · 2018=4.4 · 2019=0 · 2020=9.5 · 2021=3.9 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=2.6 · BLS 2.8

Where Adamsville Maintenance, Inc. falls in its industry

1,750 Grading construction sites establishments

Safer than 45% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #19 safest of 33 Grading construction sites employers in New Jersey.

Adamsville Maintenance, Inc. (31 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Adamsville Maintenance, Inc.
Adamsville Maintenance, Inc. (31 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Adamsville Maintenance, Inc. has fewer employees than the Grading construction sites median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.6 2.6 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 3.9 3.9 1 0 0
2020 9.5 9.5 2 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 4.4 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 4.8 4.8 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238910 · NJ · Hillsborough

1,750 Grading construction sites employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 48 employers in Hillsborough, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Eberle Materials Inc. 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hoffman Construction, Inc. 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Liberty Excavators, Inc. 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sterling Pipeline Solutions, LLC 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Orsted - Newark 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Beacon Construction Services 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Neelam Construction Corp 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Spiniello Companies - Livingston 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eastern Janitorial Services 692 FTE
CITY-NEAR Landscape Maintenance Services, Inc. 364 FTE
CITY-NEAR RB Manufacturing LLC 286 FTE
CITY-NEAR Shop Rite of Hillsborough 282 FTE
NAT-TCR Conditioned Air Systems, Inc. 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Cherry Springs Village 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Headquarters 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Cr Windows Inc 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE ACS Chandler 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Behrends Feed & Fertilizer- Fredericksburg 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Somerset Court of Cherryville 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Enterprise 5461 31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.