Packaging machinery manufacturing · California

ADCO Manufacturing

Name: ADCO Manufacturing Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Sanger, CA · ~168 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

A
Excellent Safety Record: 1.4
Avg TCR: 3.3
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

ADCO Manufacturing runs at 44% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Packaging machinery manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

ADCO Manufacturing: 1.4 TCR = 44% of Packaging machinery manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

ADCO Manufacturing safety composite

ADCO Manufacturing scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): B 1.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers
DART rate: D 0.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.1

2018→2022

ADCO Manufacturing injury rate improved

ADCO Manufacturing's TCR fell 1.1 from 2.3 in 2018 to 1.2 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 2.3 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.41× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=2.3 · 2020=1.1 · 2021=1.2 · 2022=1.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333993 · Sanger, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 44% of ind

DART 0.6 DART
RANK #4/18
PHOTO Markem-Imaje
BOOK 4y book
INJ 10 inj
SIZE ~168 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Markem-Imaje (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Quest Industri

1.5
Kliklok LLC

1.5
This site

1.4
Markem-Imaje

1.4
Pneumatic Scal

1.4

What this shows ADCO Manufacturing averages 1.4 TCR (44% of the Packaging machinery manufacturing BLS benchmark).

ADCO Manufacturing TCR series: 2018=2.3 · 2020=1.1 · 2021=1.2 · 2022=1.2 · BLS 3.3

Where ADCO Manufacturing falls in its industry

269 Packaging machinery manufactur establishments

Safer than 75% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

Grade A

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 18 Packaging machinery manufactur employers in California.

ADCO Manufacturing (168 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 2.4

ADCO Manufacturing has more employees than the Packaging machinery manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries
2022	1.2	0.6	2
2021	1.2	0.6	2
2020	1.1	0.6	2
2018	2.3	0.6	4

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333993 · CA · Sanger

269 Packaging machinery manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 46 employers in Sanger, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Markem-Imaje	KEENE, NH	1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Quest Industrial	MONROE, WI	1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Kliklok LLC	DECATUR, GA	1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Pneumatic Scale Angelus	CUYAHOGA FALLS, OH	1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Mininger Farms	LIVINGSTON	168 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Bud of California Lettuce	SALINAS	168 FTE
STATE-SIZE	California Sun Grower Services/Equipment Services & Lucero Farms - Los Banos	LOS BANOS	168 FTE
STATE-SIZE	CCH	RIVERSIDE	168 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Fruit Harvest Family, Inc.	Sanger	4,103 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Fruit Harvest No 2 Inc	Sanger	1,433 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Sanger Plant	Sanger	1,425 FTE
CITY-NEAR	EVERARDO GONZALEZ	Sanger	866 FTE
NAT-TCR	Mewbourne Oil Company	Tyler, TX	1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR	Illinois Gas Company	Olney, IL	1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR	Adamik Electric LLC	North Las Vegas, NV	1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR	6458-ZCMB	Cumberland, MD	1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Captive-Aire Systems Inc - Redding, CA	Raleigh, NC	168 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Weitsman Recycling LLC	Owego, NY	168 FTE
NAT-SIZE	6458-ZBRY	Bryan, TX	168 FTE
NAT-SIZE	ExxonMobil Blending and Packaging	Beaumont, TX	168 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.