Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction · Texas

Addicks & Barker Dam - Project

Houston, TX · ~67 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Addicks & Barker Dam - Project runs at 79% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction workplace, earning a grade B.

Addicks & Barker Dam - Project: 2.2 TCR = 79% of Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction BLS 2.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Addicks & Barker Dam - Project safety composite

Addicks & Barker Dam - Project scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Addicks & Barker Dam - Project held a steady TCR band

Addicks & Barker Dam - Project's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 6.1 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=1.4 · 2018=3.6 · 2019=6.1 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237310 · Houston, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.2 · 79% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #151/286
  • PHOTO Cortez Location
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~67 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cortez Location (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Addicks & Barker Dam - Project in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Addicks & Barker Dam - Project averages 2.2 TCR (79% of the Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Addicks & Barker Dam - Project TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=1.4 · 2018=3.6 · 2019=6.1 · 2020=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Addicks & Barker Dam - Project falls in its industry

4,078 Pavement, highway, road, stree establishments

Safer than 62% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #151 safest of 286 Pavement, highway, road, stree employers in Texas.

Addicks & Barker Dam - Project (67 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Addicks & Barker Dam - Project
Addicks & Barker Dam - Project (67 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Addicks & Barker Dam - Project has fewer employees than the Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 6.1 2.4 5 0 0
2018 3.6 2.4 3 0 0
2017 1.4 0.0 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237310 · TX · Houston

4,078 Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 5,116 employers in Houston, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cortez Location 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Twin Falls Construction 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Butler Asphalt Company 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Albquerque Asphalt 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Complex 2 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE Post Recycling 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE PT ARTH SABINE 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tolar - Northern District 67 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH IAH 11,560 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH - Airport United Airlines Offices 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-IAH 9,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Methodist Hospital Texas Medical Center 8,873 FTE
NAT-TCR T. R. Gear Landscaping 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Central Broward Construction 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Butler Sheet 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Global Specialty Fulfillment : UCA4 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Madison Center 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pacific Power Source 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE KKSP Precision Machining Pleasant Prairie 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE QSA Global, Burlington, MA 67 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.