County supervisors' and executives' offices · Michigan

Administration Building

Ann Arbor, MI · ~242 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Administration Building runs at 43% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical County supervisors' and executives' offices workplace, earning a grade A.

Administration Building: 1.4 TCR = 43% of County supervisors' and executives' offices BLS 3.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Administration Building safety composite

Administration Building scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.9

2017→2024

Administration Building injury rate improved

Administration Building's TCR fell 1.9 from 1.9 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 2.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=1.9 · 2018=1.6 · 2019=1.8 · 2020=2.9 · 2021=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 921110 · Ann Arbor, MI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 43% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #8/79
  • PHOTO HR2 - HUMAN RESOURCES
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~242 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: HR2 - HUMAN RESOURCES (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Administration Building in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Administration Building averages 1.4 TCR (43% of the County supervisors' and executives' offices BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Administration Building TCR series: 2017=1.9 · 2018=1.6 · 2019=1.8 · 2020=2.9 · 2021=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.2

Where Administration Building falls in its industry

1,010 County supervisors' and execut establishments

Safer than 79% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 79 County supervisors' and execut employers in Michigan.

Administration Building (242 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Administration Building
Administration Building (242 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Administration Building has more employees than the County supervisors' and executives' offi median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 2.9 0.0 2 0 0
2019 1.8 0.0 1 0 0
2018 1.6 0.0 0 1 0
2017 1.9 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

921110 · MI · Ann Arbor

1,010 County supervisors' and executives' offices employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 271 employers in Ann Arbor, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR HR2 - HUMAN RESOURCES 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR VILLAGE OF THORNTON 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of Greensboro Executive 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR County of Stafford-Government Center 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Champion Foods 242 FTE
STATE-SIZE Intertape Polymer Group 242 FTE
STATE-SIZE Duo-Form Plastics 242 FTE
STATE-SIZE Huhtamaki Coleman Operations 242 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Joseph Mercy Hospital-AnnArbor 5,575 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Joseph Mercy Hospital-Ann Arbor 5,554 FTE
CITY-NEAR IHA Health Services Corporation 2,533 FTE
CITY-NEAR Thomson Reuters - Ann Arbor 1,090 FTE
NAT-TCR West Bend Elevator, Inc 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Belmark Arizona 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR National Guard Products 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Elm Electrical Inc. 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Colortech Inc. 242 FTE
NAT-SIZE L&L Painting Co., Inc. 242 FTE
NAT-SIZE Vista Metals Corp 242 FTE
NAT-SIZE Concrete Pump Partners 242 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.