Disabled group homes without nursing care · Michigan

Adult Learning Systems-Lower Michigan In

Ann Arbor, MI · ~213 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Adult Learning Systems-Lower Michigan In runs at 33% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Disabled group homes without nursing care workplace, earning a grade A.

Adult Learning Systems-Lower Michigan In: 1.3 TCR = 33% of Disabled group homes without nursing care BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Adult Learning Systems-Lower Michigan In safety composite

Adult Learning Systems-Lower Michigan In scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 96% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 96% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.5

2016→2023

Adult Learning Systems-Lower Michigan In injury rate improved

Adult Learning Systems-Lower Michigan In's TCR fell 2.5 from 2.5 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2016 at 2.5 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.5 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623990 · Ann Arbor, MI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.3 · 33% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/44
  • PHOTO Crossnore Communitie…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~213 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Crossnore Communities for Children - Hendersonville Campus (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Adult Learning Systems-Lower Michigan In in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Adult Learning Systems-Lower Michigan In averages 1.3 TCR (33% of the Disabled group homes without nursing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Adult Learning Systems-Lower Michigan In TCR series: 2016=2.5 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Adult Learning Systems-Lower Michigan In falls in its industry

560 Disabled group homes without n establishments

Safer than 96% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 44 Disabled group homes without n employers in Michigan.

Adult Learning Systems-Lower Michigan In (213 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 6.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Adult Learning Systems-Lower Michigan In
Adult Learning Systems-Lower Michigan In (213 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 6.4

Adult Learning Systems-Lower Michigan In has more employees than the Disabled group homes without nursing car median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 2.5 0.6 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623990 · MI · Ann Arbor

560 Disabled group homes without nursing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 271 employers in Ann Arbor, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Crossnore Communities for Children - Hendersonville Campus 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6443-579170 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 572375 184392_2301 CAMPBELL RD_RES SUPP LVNG 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gateway Woods Family Services, Inc 1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Premiere Packaging, Inc. 213 FTE
STATE-SIZE PEPRO ENTERPRISES INC 213 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eagle Alloy Inc 213 FTE
STATE-SIZE KUKA ASSEMBLY AND TEST CORP FENTON 213 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Joseph Mercy Hospital-AnnArbor 5,575 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Joseph Mercy Hospital-Ann Arbor 5,554 FTE
CITY-NEAR IHA Health Services Corporation 2,533 FTE
CITY-NEAR Thomson Reuters - Ann Arbor 1,090 FTE
NAT-TCR TST Insulation, LLC DBA Retro Insulation 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Aspire Home Healthcare, Inc. 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 50058 Capstone - Hd Pittston Pa 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Los Fresnos SC 1.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Benchmark Electronics Moorpark 213 FTE
NAT-SIZE Masonite Corp. - Northumberland 213 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stratasys (NASH) 213 FTE
NAT-SIZE Huntington Wv Plant 213 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.