Pipe, duct and boiler insulation · Indiana

Advanced Energy Protection, LLC - Indianapolis

Greenwood, IN · ~26 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.3
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Advanced Energy Protection, LLC - Indianapolis runs at 83% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Pipe, duct and boiler insulation workplace, earning a grade C.

Advanced Energy Protection, LLC - Indianapolis: 2.3 TCR = 83% of Pipe, duct and boiler insulation BLS 2.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Advanced Energy Protection, LLC - Indianapolis safety composite

Advanced Energy Protection, LLC - Indianapolis scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Advanced Energy Protection, LLC - Indianapolis: 0.0 → 9.3 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 9.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2021

Advanced Energy Protection, LLC - Indianapolis's TCR rose 9.3 from 0.0 in 2018 to 9.3 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238290 · Greenwood, IN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.3 · 83% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #13/22
  • PHOTO 350-Honolulu
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~26 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 350-Honolulu (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Advanced Energy Protection, LLC - Indianapolis in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Advanced Energy Protection, LLC - Indianapolis averages 2.3 TCR (83% of the Pipe, duct and boiler insulation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Advanced Energy Protection, LLC - Indianapolis TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=9.3 · BLS 2.8

Where Advanced Energy Protection, LLC - Indianapolis falls in its industry

1,138 Pipe, duct and boiler insulati establishments

Safer than 41% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 22 Pipe, duct and boiler insulati employers in Indiana.

Advanced Energy Protection, LLC - Indianapolis (26 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Advanced Energy Protection, LLC - Indianapolis
Advanced Energy Protection, LLC - Indianapolis (26 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Advanced Energy Protection, LLC - Indianapolis has fewer employees than the Pipe, duct and boiler insulation median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 9.3 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238290 · IN · Greenwood

1,138 Pipe, duct and boiler insulation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 168 employers in Greenwood, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 350-Honolulu 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bortnick Construction Inc. 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Otis Elevator Company-San Antonio 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pump and Meter INC 2.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Danville 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Whitewater Valley REMC 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Franklin(Pwr Del-IN) 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southern Indiana Power 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - IND9 2,588 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : IND9 2,586 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ulta Beauty GWD 850 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ulta Beauty 715 FTE
NAT-TCR Columbia Freight Systems Inc 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR SpecSys Inc New Ulm 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Petersons North Branch Mill 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR R.S. Mowery & Sons, Inc. 2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bay Insulation Supply of Washington 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE TST 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE GA-Kings Bay 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Barrie Community Center 26 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.