Nuclear waste casks, heavy gauge metal, manufacturing · New Jersey

Advanced Manufacturing Division

Camden, NJ · ~143 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Advanced Manufacturing Division runs at 128% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Nuclear waste casks, heavy gauge metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Advanced Manufacturing Division: 4.2 TCR = 128% of Nuclear waste casks, heavy gauge metal, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Advanced Manufacturing Division safety composite

Advanced Manufacturing Division scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 43%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.3

2020→2023

Advanced Manufacturing Division injury rate improved

Advanced Manufacturing Division's TCR fell 3.3 from 5.0 in 2020 to 1.6 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 6.6 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.39× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=5.0 · 2021=6.6 · 2022=3.7 · 2023=1.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332420 · Camden, NJ ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.2 · 128% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #4/4
  • PHOTO Feldmeier Equipment AL
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 25 inj
  • SIZE ~143 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Feldmeier Equipment AL (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Advanced Manufacturing Division in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Advanced Manufacturing Division averages 4.2 TCR (128% of the Nuclear waste casks, heavy gauge metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Advanced Manufacturing Division TCR series: 2020=5 · 2021=6.6 · 2022=3.7 · 2023=1.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Advanced Manufacturing Division falls in its industry

355 Nuclear waste casks, heavy gau establishments

Safer than 43% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 4 Nuclear waste casks, heavy gau employers in New Jersey.

Advanced Manufacturing Division (143 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 3.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Advanced Manufacturing Division
Advanced Manufacturing Division (143 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 3.6

Advanced Manufacturing Division has more employees than the Nuclear waste casks, heavy gauge metal, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 1.6 1.6 3 0 0
2022 3.7 3.7 5 0 0
2021 6.6 4.6 10 0 0
2020 5.0 5.0 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332420 · NJ · Camden

355 Nuclear waste casks, heavy gauge metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 93 employers in Camden, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Feldmeier Equipment AL 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Thermal Equipment Corporation 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Southern Tank & Mfg. Inc 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR PAUL MUELLER COMPANY 4.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE OA Peterson Construction Co., Inc 143 FTE
STATE-SIZE AP Construction 143 FTE
STATE-SIZE BrandSafway Industries, LLC - Swedesboro Branch 143 FTE
STATE-SIZE American Biltrite - Moorestown, NJ 143 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cooper University Hospital 10,223 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1 Cooper Plaza 6,439 FTE
CITY-NEAR Our Lady of Lourdes Medical Center 2,283 FTE
CITY-NEAR Virtua Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital, Inc 1,906 FTE
NAT-TCR Silgan Plastic Food Containers - 1 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR USM Fulton 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Ohio Gasket and Shim 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Universal Electric Company INc 4.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE BT Winter Park 143 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lifebanc 143 FTE
NAT-SIZE prestige farms 143 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cancer Center 143 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.