Hydraulic fracturing wells on a contract basis · Texas

Advanced Stimulation Technologies, Inc.

Midland, TX · ~306 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
1.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Advanced Stimulation Technologies, Inc. runs at 38% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Hydraulic fracturing wells on a contract basis workplace, earning a grade A.

Advanced Stimulation Technologies, Inc.: 0.7 TCR = 38% of Hydraulic fracturing wells on a contract basis BLS 1.9 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Advanced Stimulation Technologies, Inc. safety composite

Advanced Stimulation Technologies, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Advanced Stimulation Technologies, Inc. held a steady TCR band

Advanced Stimulation Technologies, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.2 from 0.9 in 2021 to 0.7 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 0.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=0.9 · 2022=0.6 · 2023=0.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 213112 · Midland, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 38% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #83/196
  • PHOTO Ideal Completion Ser…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~306 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ideal Completion Services, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Advanced Stimulation Technologies, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Advanced Stimulation Technologies, Inc. averages 0.7 TCR (38% of the Hydraulic fracturing wells on a contract basis BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Advanced Stimulation Technologies, Inc. TCR series: 2021=0.9 · 2022=0.6 · 2023=0.7 · BLS 1.9

Where Advanced Stimulation Technologies, Inc. falls in its industry

467 Hydraulic fracturing wells on establishments

Safer than 60% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #83 safest of 196 Hydraulic fracturing wells on employers in Texas.

Advanced Stimulation Technologies, Inc. (306 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 122 employees and a TCR of 0.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate Advanced Stimulation Technologies, Inc.
Advanced Stimulation Technologies, Inc. (306 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 122 employees and a TCR of 0.9

Advanced Stimulation Technologies, Inc. has more employees than the Hydraulic fracturing wells on a contract median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.7 0.0 4 0 0
2022 0.6 0.2 3 0 0
2021 0.9 0.6 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

213112 · TX · Midland

467 Hydraulic fracturing wells on a contract basis employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 359 employers in Midland, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ideal Completion Services, LLC 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Triangle Well Servicing 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stanton 2818 E FM 1212, Stanton, TX 79782 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Liberty Oilfield Services LLC 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Austin Commercial Main Office Travis 306 FTE
STATE-SIZE Capco Contractors 306 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brazos M&E 306 FTE
STATE-SIZE TNT Crane & Rigging - Houston Branch 306 FTE
CITY-NEAR TX Midland 4,667 FTE
CITY-NEAR Midland Memorial Hospital 2,011 FTE
CITY-NEAR Midland Jobsites 1,716 FTE
CITY-NEAR ProPetro Services, Inc. 1,666 FTE
NAT-TCR 850 Hicksville Rd 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Eye Clinic of Faribault DBA Richie Eye Clinic 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR VRS Vancouver, WA 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR SKF USA Inc. - Elgin 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Philips NAM Personal Health Stamford CT 306 FTE
NAT-SIZE Atlanta (breakbulk) 041 306 FTE
NAT-SIZE 013-FF01-DARBOY 306 FTE
NAT-SIZE Axium New Albany Plant #1 306 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.