Expansion joints, metal, manufacturing · New York

Advanced Thermal Systems, Inc.

Lancaster, NY · ~35 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Advanced Thermal Systems, Inc. runs at 56% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Expansion joints, metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Advanced Thermal Systems, Inc.: 1.9 TCR = 56% of Expansion joints, metal, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Advanced Thermal Systems, Inc. safety composite

Advanced Thermal Systems, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Advanced Thermal Systems, Inc. held a steady TCR band

Advanced Thermal Systems, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 5.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=2.8 · 2020=3.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=3.1 · 2023=5.9 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332312 · Lancaster, NY AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 56% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/46
  • PHOTO E-Z Line Pipe Suppor…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: E-Z Line Pipe Support Co. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Advanced Thermal Systems, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Advanced Thermal Systems, Inc. averages 1.9 TCR (56% of the Expansion joints, metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Advanced Thermal Systems, Inc. TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=2.8 · 2020=3 · 2021=0 · 2022=3.1 · 2023=5.9 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Advanced Thermal Systems, Inc. falls in its industry

1,491 Expansion joints, metal, manuf establishments

Safer than 82% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 46 Expansion joints, metal, manuf employers in New York.

Advanced Thermal Systems, Inc. (35 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Advanced Thermal Systems, Inc.
Advanced Thermal Systems, Inc. (35 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6

Advanced Thermal Systems, Inc. has fewer employees than the Expansion joints, metal, manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 5.9 3.0 2 0 0
2022 3.1 3.1 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 3.0 3.0 1 0 0
2019 2.8 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332312 · NY · Lancaster

1,491 Expansion joints, metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 83 employers in Lancaster, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR E-Z Line Pipe Support Co. 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR WW AFCO Steel-Hirschfeld Division San Angelo 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR CMC Rebar Farmersville 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Realine Steel 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sandy Knoll Farms, Inc. 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE NY State Solar Farmingdale 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Morgan Facilities 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE RICHTER+RATNER CONTRACTING CORP 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon Transportation Services : BUF5 1,188 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - BUF5 1,074 FTE
CITY-NEAR Erie Logistics 713 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - BUF9 665 FTE
NAT-TCR Riverside Elementary 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR ICC Hermitage 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR O'Neal Excavating and Construction Inc 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR N. Jonas & Co., Inc 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE American Excavating of Michigan Limited 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mountain Meadow Herbs 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Public Works and Facilities 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Public Works 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.