Printing, flexographic (except books, grey goods) · Michigan

Advantage Label & Packaging, Inc

Grand Rapids, MI · ~63 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Advantage Label & Packaging, Inc runs at 61% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Printing, flexographic (except books, grey goods) workplace, earning a grade B.

Advantage Label & Packaging, Inc: 2.0 TCR = 61% of Printing, flexographic (except books, grey goods) BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Advantage Label & Packaging, Inc safety composite

Advantage Label & Packaging, Inc scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.4

2022→2024

Advantage Label & Packaging, Inc injury rate improved

Advantage Label & Packaging, Inc's TCR fell 4.4 from 4.4 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 4.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=4.4 · 2023=1.6 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 323111 · Grand Rapids, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 61% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #17/55
  • PHOTO Brook & Whittle, Ltd…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~63 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Brook & Whittle, Ltd. - Croydon (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Advantage Label & Packaging, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Advantage Label & Packaging, Inc averages 2.0 TCR (61% of the Printing, flexographic (except books, grey goods) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Advantage Label & Packaging, Inc TCR series: 2022=4.4 · 2023=1.6 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Advantage Label & Packaging, Inc falls in its industry

2,001 Printing, flexographic (except establishments

Safer than 63% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 55 Printing, flexographic (except employers in Michigan.

Advantage Label & Packaging, Inc (63 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Advantage Label & Packaging, Inc
Advantage Label & Packaging, Inc (63 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Advantage Label & Packaging, Inc has fewer employees than the Printing, flexographic (except books, gr median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 1.6 0.0 1 0 0
2022 4.4 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

323111 · MI · Grand Rapids

2,001 Printing, flexographic (except books, grey goods) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 1,006 employers in Grand Rapids, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Brook & Whittle, Ltd. - Croydon 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Secaucus Facility 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dumont Printing, Inc 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR NovaCopy - Malden 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE DeGrandchamps Blueberry Farm 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gas Construction Macomb 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE NHI Commercial 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gerber Construction Co. Inc. 63 FTE
CITY-NEAR SHHG-GR BUTTERWORTH CA 9,012 FTE
CITY-NEAR SH Butterworth Hospital 7,397 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Health Saint Mary's Hospital-MH-MI 2,914 FTE
CITY-NEAR Steelcase - Grand Rapids / Kentwood 2,817 FTE
NAT-TCR Precision Concrete Construction Inc 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Hajoca 718 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR South Beach Resort 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Safford 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Dothan Al - 101 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Central Transport of Ohio - 436 436SH 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ireland Electric Corporation 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Disability Services 63 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.