Trucking, specialized freight (except used goods), local · Pennsylvania

Advantage Tank Lines 20065 Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh, PA · ~47 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.2
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Advantage Tank Lines 20065 Pittsburgh runs at 71% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Trucking, specialized freight (except used goods), local workplace, earning a grade B.

Advantage Tank Lines 20065 Pittsburgh: 3.2 TCR = 71% of Trucking, specialized freight (except used goods), local BLS 4.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Advantage Tank Lines 20065 Pittsburgh safety composite

Advantage Tank Lines 20065 Pittsburgh scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 47%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Advantage Tank Lines 20065 Pittsburgh: 3.4 → 4.5 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 4.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.7× in 2024

Advantage Tank Lines 20065 Pittsburgh's TCR rose 1.1 from 3.4 in 2021 to 4.5 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.7× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484220 · Pittsburgh, PA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 3.2 · 71% of ind

  • DART 2.3 DART
  • RANK #28/61
  • PHOTO H.R. Ewell, Inc.--Co…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: H.R. Ewell, Inc.--Cocoa, FL Terminal (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Advantage Tank Lines 20065 Pittsburgh in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Advantage Tank Lines 20065 Pittsburgh averages 3.2 TCR (71% of the Trucking, specialized freight (except used goods), local BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Advantage Tank Lines 20065 Pittsburgh TCR series: 2021=3.4 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=2.3 · 2024=4.5 · BLS 4.5

Where Advantage Tank Lines 20065 Pittsburgh falls in its industry

1,130 Trucking, specialized freight establishments

Safer than 53% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #28 safest of 61 Trucking, specialized freight employers in Pennsylvania.

Advantage Tank Lines 20065 Pittsburgh (47 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Advantage Tank Lines 20065 Pittsburgh
Advantage Tank Lines 20065 Pittsburgh (47 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Advantage Tank Lines 20065 Pittsburgh has more employees than the Trucking, specialized freight (except us median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.5 2.3 4 0 0
2023 2.3 2.3 2 0 0
2022 2.6 2.6 2 0 0
2021 3.4 3.4 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484220 · PA · Pittsburgh

1,130 Trucking, specialized freight (except used goods), local employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 1,170 employers in Pittsburgh, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR H.R. Ewell, Inc.--Cocoa, FL Terminal 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR TransChem USA, LLC 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Grand Forks T & M 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR 5066_15455 3.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Dan Schantz Greenhouse (Rising Sun, MD) 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hillendale Services, LLC 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mansfield 14235 US Route 6, Mansfield, PA 16933 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Electric Division Wilkes Barre 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR United States Steel COrporation 15,229 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh- Oakland 14,135 FTE
CITY-NEAR UPMC Presbyterian Shadyside (PUH) 13,900 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh-Oakland 13,208 FTE
NAT-TCR AGLC Athens Service Center 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 1759 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Wayne Davis Concrete Tallapoosa Shop 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 5815 - Woodlawn 3.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Grand Openings, Inc 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Garfield 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Orda at Lake Placid 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE NorthEast Earth Mechanics, LLC 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.