Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, milk, petroleum), local · Texas

Advantage Tank Lines 20195 Houston

Houston, TX · ~48 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.3
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Advantage Tank Lines 20195 Houston runs at 28% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, milk, petroleum), local workplace, earning a grade A.

Advantage Tank Lines 20195 Houston: 1.3 TCR = 28% of Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, milk, petroleum), local BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Advantage Tank Lines 20195 Houston safety composite

Advantage Tank Lines 20195 Houston scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 89% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 43%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 89% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Advantage Tank Lines 20195 Houston: 0.0 → 2.5 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 2.5 TCR · DART/TCR 2× in 2024

Advantage Tank Lines 20195 Houston's TCR rose 2.5 from 0.0 in 2023 to 2.5 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484220 · Houston, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.3 · 28% of ind

  • DART 2.5 DART
  • RANK #22/118
  • PHOTO Advantage Tank Lines…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~48 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Advantage Tank Lines 20090 Green (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Advantage Tank Lines 20195 Houston in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Advantage Tank Lines 20195 Houston averages 1.3 TCR (28% of the Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, milk, petroleum), local BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Advantage Tank Lines 20195 Houston TCR series: 2023=0 · 2024=2.5 · BLS 4.5

Where Advantage Tank Lines 20195 Houston falls in its industry

1,130 Tanker trucking (e.g., chemica establishments

Safer than 89% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #22 safest of 118 Tanker trucking (e.g., chemica employers in Texas.

Advantage Tank Lines 20195 Houston (48 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Advantage Tank Lines 20195 Houston
Advantage Tank Lines 20195 Houston (48 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Advantage Tank Lines 20195 Houston has more employees than the Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.5 2.5 2 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484220 · TX · Houston

1,130 Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, milk, petroleum), local employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 5,116 employers in Houston, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Advantage Tank Lines 20090 Green 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Division 30 - North Island Fuels 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pedowitz Machinery Movers Of CT 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Petro-Chemical Transport 51092 Corpus Christi 1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE SAN ANTONIO SOD FARM 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE SUPPORT SERVICES 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE WRANGLER FEED YARD 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kempenaar Dairy LLC 48 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH IAH 11,560 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH - Airport United Airlines Offices 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-IAH 9,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Methodist Hospital Texas Medical Center 8,873 FTE
NAT-TCR St Louis, MO - Hall St Bldg 8 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR IV & Claridge Construction 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR US02 Laurens Link Snacks, Inc. 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Macedonia Middle School 1.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Arnold Ready Mix Corp 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Barro's Pizza, Dysart 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Barro's Pizza, Desert Willow 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE TPC Mechanical 48 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.