General medical and surgical hospitals · California

Adventist Medical Center-Reedley

Reedley, CA · ~961 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
4.5
Avg TCR
7.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Adventist Medical Center-Reedley runs at 60% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical General medical and surgical hospitals workplace, earning a grade B.

Adventist Medical Center-Reedley: 4.5 TCR = 60% of General medical and surgical hospitals BLS 7.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Adventist Medical Center-Reedley safety composite

Adventist Medical Center-Reedley scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 60% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.0

2016→2023

Adventist Medical Center-Reedley injury rate improved

Adventist Medical Center-Reedley's TCR fell 3.0 from 6.6 in 2016 to 3.6 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2016 at 6.6 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.36× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.6 · 2017=5.3 · 2019=2.9 · 2020=4.6 · 2021=3.9 · 2023=3.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 622110 · Reedley, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 4.5 · 60% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #145/662
  • PHOTO Marshall County Heal…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 103 inj
  • SIZE ~961 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Marshall County Healthcare Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Adventist Medical Center-Reedley in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Adventist Medical Center-Reedley averages 4.5 TCR (60% of the General medical and surgical hospitals BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Adventist Medical Center-Reedley TCR series: 2016=6.6 · 2017=5.3 · 2019=2.9 · 2020=4.6 · 2021=3.9 · 2023=3.6 · BLS 7.5

Where Adventist Medical Center-Reedley falls in its industry

6,862 General medical and surgical h establishments

Safer than 60% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #145 safest of 662 General medical and surgical h employers in California.

Adventist Medical Center-Reedley (961 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Adventist Medical Center-Reedley
Adventist Medical Center-Reedley (961 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2

Adventist Medical Center-Reedley has more employees than the General medical and surgical hospitals median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 3.6 1.6 14 13 0
2021 3.9 0.6 12 14 0
2020 4.6 2.2 16 13 0
2019 2.9 0.3 5 14 0
2017 5.3 1.5 21 21 0
2016 6.6 2.2 35 15 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

622110 · CA · Reedley

6,862 General medical and surgical hospitals employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 60 employers in Reedley, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Marshall County Healthcare Center 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Conway Medical Center 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR South Nassau Communities Hospital 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR St. Thomas More Hospital 4.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE T&A - Huron - Harvest 961 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ono-CORP 961 FTE
STATE-SIZE Salinas FLC 963 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cue Health, Inc 963 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sun Valley Packing 554 FTE
CITY-NEAR Moonlight Packing Company LLC Field 537 FTE
CITY-NEAR GAR BENNETT LLC 277 FTE
CITY-NEAR Peters Fruit Farms Inc. 274 FTE
NAT-TCR Charlotte Based Operations 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Advanced Plastiform Inc. 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Ralph Martinez Trucking Inc. 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Precision Fabrics Group - Distribution Center 4.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE North Babylon UFSD 961 FTE
NAT-SIZE Foxconn Industrial Internet 961 FTE
NAT-SIZE Txrrk - Round Rock 961 FTE
NAT-SIZE Flint Hills Resources - West Plant 961 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.