Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · California

Aegis of Pleasant Hill

Pleasant Hill, CA · ~75 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Aegis of Pleasant Hill runs at 267% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Aegis of Pleasant Hill: 10.2 TCR = 267% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Aegis of Pleasant Hill safety composite

Aegis of Pleasant Hill scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

25/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

DART rate
F 31.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Aegis of Pleasant Hill: 3.7 → 32.6 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 89.2 TCR · DART/TCR 3.06× in 2024

Aegis of Pleasant Hill's TCR rose 28.9 from 3.7 in 2016 to 32.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 89.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 3.06× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Pleasant Hill, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.2 · 267% of ind

  • DART 31.1 DART
  • RANK #359/635
  • PHOTO Commonwealth Senior …
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 26 inj
  • SIZE ~75 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Commonwealth Senior Living at Haddam (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Aegis of Pleasant Hill in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Aegis of Pleasant Hill averages 10.2 TCR (267% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Aegis of Pleasant Hill TCR series: 2016=3.7 · 2017=6.8 · 2018=8.6 · 2019=4.8 · 2020=7.8 · 2021=52.6 · 2022=89.2 · 2023=6.8 · 2024=32.6 · BLS 3.8

Where Aegis of Pleasant Hill falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 30% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #359 safest of 635 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

Aegis of Pleasant Hill (75 employees, TCR 10.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Aegis of Pleasant Hill
Aegis of Pleasant Hill (75 employees, TCR 10.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Aegis of Pleasant Hill has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 32.6 31.1 3 19 0
2023 6.8 3.4 4 0 0
2022 89.2 87.4 4 47 0
2021 52.6 52.6 1 27 0
2020 7.8 7.8 0 5 0
2019 4.8 4.8 3 0 0
2018 8.6 8.6 5 0 0
2017 6.8 6.8 4 0 0
2016 3.7 1.9 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CA · Pleasant Hill

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 44 employers in Pleasant Hill, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Commonwealth Senior Living at Haddam 10.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6273_16613 10.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Ada 10.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Birchwood Cottage Mankato 10.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sunset Farms, Inc 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE Martinelli Vineyard Managment, Inc 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE WESTVIEW BERRY FARMS 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE DJRAS CORP DBA PRIME HARVEST CONTRACTING 75 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0330 - Pleasant Hill 217 FTE
CITY-NEAR Concord Feed & Fuel 167 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6962-SWY-0025-0025-02941 156 FTE
CITY-NEAR SWY-0025-0025-02941 FAC-02941-PLEASANT HILL-CA 147 FTE
NAT-TCR A-TEC - Elgin 10.2 TCR
NAT-TCR EC620 10.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Lafayette, in Branch 10.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Palm Garden of Vero Beach, LLC 10.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Redner's Warehouse Market Oxford 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE Main Office - 01 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE Roanoke 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE Citrosuco North America, Inc. 75 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.