Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Washington

Aegis of Ravenna

Seattle, WA · ~75 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
18.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Aegis of Ravenna runs at 489% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Aegis of Ravenna: 18.6 TCR = 489% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Aegis of Ravenna safety composite

Aegis of Ravenna scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

15/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 18.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
F 38.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Aegis of Ravenna: 0.0 → 41.2 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 48.6 TCR · DART/TCR 2.05× in 2024

Aegis of Ravenna's TCR rose 41.2 from 0.0 in 2017 to 41.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 48.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 2.05× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Seattle, WA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 18.6 · 489% of ind

  • DART 38.0 DART
  • RANK #197/216
  • PHOTO Gables of Canton LLC
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 29 inj
  • SIZE ~75 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Gables of Canton LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Aegis of Ravenna in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Aegis of Ravenna averages 18.6 TCR (489% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Aegis of Ravenna TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=5.9 · 2019=4.7 · 2020=6.7 · 2021=13.5 · 2022=48.6 · 2023=28.1 · 2024=41.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Aegis of Ravenna falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #197 safest of 216 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Washington.

Aegis of Ravenna (75 employees, TCR 18.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Aegis of Ravenna
Aegis of Ravenna (75 employees, TCR 18.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Aegis of Ravenna has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 41.2 38.0 7 19 0
2023 28.1 25.2 3 16 0
2022 48.6 46.9 7 22 0
2021 13.5 10.1 6 2 0
2020 6.7 6.7 3 1 0
2019 4.7 4.7 2 0 0
2018 5.9 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · WA · Seattle

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 1,279 employers in Seattle, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Gables of Canton LLC 18.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Elderberry Square Community 18.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Inn at Glenellen 18.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wesley Court Assisted Living Community 18.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Al Dahra ACX, Inc. - Ellensburg 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE MLDEO-MLDIV-EL ORO CATTLE CO 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE FV Frontier Mariner 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE John I. Haas, Inc. Warehouse Division 75 FTE
CITY-NEAR UW Seattle 32,378 FTE
CITY-NEAR The United States of America 25,000 FTE
CITY-NEAR Starz Entertainment 25,000 FTE
CITY-NEAR UW Medical Center - Montlake and NW 11,307 FTE
NAT-TCR Hotel Current 18.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 1089 18.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Road 18.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Ecp-Ground Ops 18.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE TGI Fridays Chicago Midway 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE Castle Rock 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE Roger Sherman School 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE Menomonee Falls 75 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.