Firefighting, forest · Washington

Aero-Flite, Inc. Spokane Hangar

Spokane, WA · ~140 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Aero-Flite, Inc. Spokane Hangar runs at 42% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Firefighting, forest workplace, earning a grade A.

Aero-Flite, Inc. Spokane Hangar: 1.9 TCR = 42% of Firefighting, forest BLS 4.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Aero-Flite, Inc. Spokane Hangar safety composite

Aero-Flite, Inc. Spokane Hangar scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.0

2016→2024

Aero-Flite, Inc. Spokane Hangar injury rate improved

Aero-Flite, Inc. Spokane Hangar's TCR fell 5.0 from 5.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 5.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.0 · 2017=3.6 · 2018=3.2 · 2019=2.2 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=1.3 · 2022=0.6 · 2023=1.2 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 115310 · Spokane, WA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.9 · 42% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/6
  • PHOTO Coulson Aviation USA
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~140 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Coulson Aviation USA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Aero-Flite, Inc. Spokane Hangar in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Aero-Flite, Inc. Spokane Hangar averages 1.9 TCR (42% of the Firefighting, forest BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Aero-Flite, Inc. Spokane Hangar TCR series: 2016=5 · 2017=3.6 · 2018=3.2 · 2019=2.2 · 2020=0 · 2021=1.3 · 2022=0.6 · 2023=1.2 · 2024=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Aero-Flite, Inc. Spokane Hangar falls in its industry

84 Firefighting, forest establishments

Safer than 77% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 6 Firefighting, forest employers in Washington.

Aero-Flite, Inc. Spokane Hangar (140 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Aero-Flite, Inc. Spokane Hangar
Aero-Flite, Inc. Spokane Hangar (140 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 4.6

Aero-Flite, Inc. Spokane Hangar has more employees than the Firefighting, forest median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 1.2 0.0 2 0 0
2022 0.6 0.0 1 0 0
2021 1.3 0.7 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.2 1.4 3 0 0
2018 3.2 0.0 4 0 0
2017 3.6 1.8 4 0 0
2016 5.0 2.0 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

115310 · WA · Spokane

84 Firefighting, forest employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 551 employers in Spokane, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Coulson Aviation USA 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jefferson Resource Company, Inc. 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Neptune Aviation Services Inc. - Missoula, MT 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cutting Edge Forestry Inc. 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sessler, Inc 140 FTE
STATE-SIZE Walters & Wolf Washington 140 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nelson and Sons Construction 140 FTE
STATE-SIZE Seagen - North Creek 140 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2252-00000345 6,769 FTE
CITY-NEAR WA642 SACRED HEART MEDICAL CENTER-SPOKANE HR 5,062 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - GEG1 2,476 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Spokane 2,451 FTE
NAT-TCR Deem Structural Services 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Suburban Tool & Die Co., Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 30 Catawba Logistics 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Bainbridge 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Great Northern Corporation - Chippewa Falls Fulfillment 140 FTE
NAT-SIZE Eldon Terminal 140 FTE
NAT-SIZE Triangle Electric Company 140 FTE
NAT-SIZE Morrison Products Cleveland 140 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.