Duct work (e.g., cooling, dust collection, exhaust, heating, ventilation) installation · Maine

Aero Heating & Ventilating

Portland, ME · ~57 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
19.9
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Aero Heating & Ventilating runs at 712% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Duct work (e.g., cooling, dust collection, exhaust, heating, ventilation) installation workplace, earning a grade F.

Aero Heating & Ventilating: 19.9 TCR = 712% of Duct work (e.g., cooling, dust collection, exhaust, heating, ventilation) installation BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Aero Heating & Ventilating safety composite

Aero Heating & Ventilating scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

18/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 19.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.8

2016→2017

Aero Heating & Ventilating injury rate improved

Aero Heating & Ventilating's TCR fell 9.8 from 24.8 in 2016 to 15.1 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 24.8 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0.28× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=24.8 · 2017=15.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · Portland, ME ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 19.9 · 712% of ind

  • DART 5.6 DART
  • RANK #25/27
  • PHOTO Feller Heating
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~57 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Feller Heating (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maine employers → · Look up another →

Aero Heating & Ventilating in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Aero Heating & Ventilating averages 19.9 TCR (712% of the Duct work (e.g., cooling, dust collection, exhaust, heating, ventilation) installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Aero Heating & Ventilating TCR series: 2016=24.8 · 2017=15.1 · BLS 2.8

Where Aero Heating & Ventilating falls in its industry

5,793 Duct work (e.g., cooling, dust establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maine alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #25 safest of 27 Duct work (e.g., cooling, dust employers in Maine.

Aero Heating & Ventilating (57 employees, TCR 19.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Aero Heating & Ventilating
Aero Heating & Ventilating (57 employees, TCR 19.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Aero Heating & Ventilating has fewer employees than the Duct work (e.g., cooling, dust collectio median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 15.1 5.6 8 0 0
2016 24.8 5.7 13 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · ME · Portland

5,793 Duct work (e.g., cooling, dust collection, exhaust, heating, ventilation) installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,397 rated employers in Maine with headcount on file · 244 employers in Portland, ME · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Feller Heating 19.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR GIBSON'S HEATING & PLUMBING, INC 19.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Maeser Heating and Air 20.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tribus Services - Long Beach AMI 19.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Thayer Corporation 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gerrity Industries 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE ME004 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Freshwater Stone and Brickwork, Inc. 57 FTE
CITY-NEAR MMC 8,437 FTE
CITY-NEAR MMC- 22 Bram 5,535 FTE
CITY-NEAR Point32Health Portland 4,440 FTE
CITY-NEAR MMP Practices 2,063 FTE
NAT-TCR Ashley Furniture Homestore- Albuquerque DC 19.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Bickford of Ames 19.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 482025-Crp-Portairs Sta 19.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Fairacres Manor Inc. 19.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE N and r of Jefferson City LLC 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Yokohama Industries Americas Inc. Division 5 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Legends - Charlotte PNC Amphitheate 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sandy Pines Wilderness Trails, Inc 57 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.