Drugs merchant wholesalers · Connecticut

AeroMed (Glastonbury Operations) - Glastonbury, CT

Glastonbury, CT · ~114 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
5.5
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

AeroMed (Glastonbury Operations) - Glastonbury, CT runs at 249% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Drugs merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade F.

AeroMed (Glastonbury Operations) - Glastonbury, CT: 5.5 TCR = 249% of Drugs merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

AeroMed (Glastonbury Operations) - Glastonbury, CT safety composite

AeroMed (Glastonbury Operations) - Glastonbury, CT scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 21%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

AeroMed (Glastonbury Operations) - Glastonbury, CT: 5.8 → 6.3 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 6.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.66× in 2019

AeroMed (Glastonbury Operations) - Glastonbury, CT's TCR rose 0.5 from 5.8 in 2017 to 6.3 in 2019. In 2019, DART was 0.66× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 424210 · Glastonbury, CT ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 5.5 · 249% of ind

  • DART 3.6 DART
  • RANK #5/7
  • PHOTO 10164000 10164000-AB…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~114 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 10164000 10164000-ABDC WHITESTOWN INDY (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

AeroMed (Glastonbury Operations) - Glastonbury, CT in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows AeroMed (Glastonbury Operations) - Glastonbury, CT averages 5.5 TCR (249% of the Drugs merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

AeroMed (Glastonbury Operations) - Glastonbury, CT TCR series: 2017=5.8 · 2018=4.3 · 2019=6.3 · BLS 2.2

Where AeroMed (Glastonbury Operations) - Glastonbury, CT falls in its industry

514 Drugs merchant wholesalers establishments

Safer than 21% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 7 Drugs merchant wholesalers employers in Connecticut.

AeroMed (Glastonbury Operations) - Glastonbury, CT (114 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate AeroMed (Glastonbury Operations) - Glastonbury, CT
AeroMed (Glastonbury Operations) - Glastonbury, CT (114 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 2.9

AeroMed (Glastonbury Operations) - Glastonbury, CT has more employees than the Drugs merchant wholesalers median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 6.3 3.6 7 0 0
2018 4.3 4.3 5 0 0
2017 5.8 5.8 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

424210 · CT · Glastonbury

514 Drugs merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 61 employers in Glastonbury, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 10164000 10164000-ABDC WHITESTOWN INDY 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 10D8173 PHARMA PORTLAND 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cardinal Health Lakeland 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cardinal Health Hudson,WI PD 5.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Trelleborg Coated Systems US, Inc. dba Uretek 114 FTE
STATE-SIZE Allnex-Wallingford 114 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Gilman Brothers Company 114 FTE
STATE-SIZE ELG Utica Alloys 114 FTE
CITY-NEAR Company Wide 583 FTE
CITY-NEAR TheKey - CT, Glastonbury (100 Western Blvd.) 434 FTE
CITY-NEAR Glastonbury Town Hall 406 FTE
CITY-NEAR 10336 Glastonbury 290 FTE
NAT-TCR Ottenweller Company, Inc. MA 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Reliable Property Services 721 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR City Scrap & Salvage Company 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Lci - 057 5.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cedar Run 114 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chromalox Inc. - Pittsburgh 114 FTE
NAT-SIZE Northwest Hardwoods, Inc. Prairie 114 FTE
NAT-SIZE NDX Stern Empire 114 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.