Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) · Oklahoma

AES Shady Point

Panama, OK · ~75 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
3.2
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

AES Shady Point runs at 266% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) workplace, earning a grade F.

AES Shady Point: 3.2 TCR = 266% of Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS 1.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

AES Shady Point safety composite

AES Shady Point scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.3

2016→2018

AES Shady Point injury rate improved

AES Shady Point's TCR fell 2.3 from 3.6 in 2016 to 1.3 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 4.7 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.6 · 2017=4.7 · 2018=1.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Panama, OK ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 3.2 · 266% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #27/33
  • PHOTO Plant Bowen
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~75 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Plant Bowen (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oklahoma employers → · Look up another →

AES Shady Point in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows AES Shady Point averages 3.2 TCR (266% of the Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

AES Shady Point TCR series: 2016=3.6 · 2017=4.7 · 2018=1.3 · BLS 1.2

Where AES Shady Point falls in its industry

846 Electric power generation, fos establishments

Safer than 17% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oklahoma alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #27 safest of 33 Electric power generation, fos employers in Oklahoma.

AES Shady Point (75 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate AES Shady Point
AES Shady Point (75 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

AES Shady Point has more employees than the Electric power generation, fossil fuel ( median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 1.3 0.0 1 0 0
2017 4.7 0.0 2 2 0
2016 3.6 0.0 2 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · OK · Panama

846 Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 5,320 rated employers in Oklahoma with headcount on file · 3 employers in Panama, OK · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Plant Bowen 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Guadalupe Energy Center 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Miller Steam Plant - APC 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Teton Petroleum Ptransport 3.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Chickasha Field Office 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE COPPERHEAD PIPELINE AND CONSTRUCTION INC 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE US167: Tulsa 441 - SG 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE Value Added Products 75 FTE
CITY-NEAR OG&E-River Valley PP 72 FTE
CITY-NEAR River Valley Power Plant 72 FTE
NAT-TCR Macon Service Center 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 343 - Louisville 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 2365 Shoppers-Potomac Yard (Sv 05204 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Consolidated Electrical Distributors (Pc0234) 3.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Creative Business Interiors 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE Craig HomeCare-St.Louis 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nevada Office 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE DIX 75 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.