Coaxial mechanical face seals manufacturing · Ohio

Affinity Displays and Expositions Inc

Cincinnati, OH · ~69 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Affinity Displays and Expositions Inc runs at 109% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Coaxial mechanical face seals manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Affinity Displays and Expositions Inc: 3.6 TCR = 109% of Coaxial mechanical face seals manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Affinity Displays and Expositions Inc safety composite

Affinity Displays and Expositions Inc scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.6

2016→2024

Affinity Displays and Expositions Inc injury rate improved

Affinity Displays and Expositions Inc's TCR fell 6.6 from 6.6 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 9.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.6 · 2017=1.1 · 2019=5.7 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=3.2 · 2022=9.5 · 2023=2.8 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 339991 · Cincinnati, OH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.6 · 109% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #18/23
  • PHOTO Acushnet Rubber Co.,…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~69 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Acushnet Rubber Co., Inc dba Precix (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Affinity Displays and Expositions Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Affinity Displays and Expositions Inc averages 3.6 TCR (109% of the Coaxial mechanical face seals manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Affinity Displays and Expositions Inc TCR series: 2016=6.6 · 2017=1.1 · 2019=5.7 · 2020=0 · 2021=3.2 · 2022=9.5 · 2023=2.8 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Affinity Displays and Expositions Inc falls in its industry

218 Coaxial mechanical face seals establishments

Safer than 27% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 23 Coaxial mechanical face seals employers in Ohio.

Affinity Displays and Expositions Inc (69 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 84 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Affinity Displays and Expositions Inc
Affinity Displays and Expositions Inc (69 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 84 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Affinity Displays and Expositions Inc has fewer employees than the Coaxial mechanical face seals manufactur median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 2.8 0.0 2 0 0
2022 9.5 1.6 6 0 0
2021 3.2 1.6 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 5.7 3.4 5 0 0
2017 1.1 0.0 1 0 0
2016 6.6 2.2 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

339991 · OH · Cincinnati

218 Coaxial mechanical face seals manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 1,513 employers in Cincinnati, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Acushnet Rubber Co., Inc dba Precix 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Clean Seal 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Freudenberg-NOK General Partnership 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR H-O Products 3.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Trillium Farms Main Office 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cambridge Ohio 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Canton South Svc Ctr 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Shelly Company - Northeast Division - HMA 69 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center 17,011 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cincinnati Operations 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain : Evendale, OH 7,118 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain Evendale OH 6,400 FTE
NAT-TCR Salem Wood Products 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Mondovi 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Tyler 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Ames Eye Center 3.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Peoria, IL 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE Plant 4 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE NJ - Corporate Administration 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE Corporate 69 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.