Group homes for the disabled with nursing care · Texas

Afton Oaks Nursing and Rehab center

Houston, TX · ~106 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Afton Oaks Nursing and Rehab center runs at 39% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Group homes for the disabled with nursing care workplace, earning a grade A.

Afton Oaks Nursing and Rehab center: 2.5 TCR = 39% of Group homes for the disabled with nursing care BLS 6.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Afton Oaks Nursing and Rehab center safety composite

Afton Oaks Nursing and Rehab center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 88% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.2

2018→2022

Afton Oaks Nursing and Rehab center injury rate improved

Afton Oaks Nursing and Rehab center's TCR fell 3.2 from 6.1 in 2018 to 2.9 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 6.1 TCR. In 2022, DART was 1.13× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=6.1 · 2019=2.6 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=1.1 · 2022=2.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Houston, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 2.5 · 39% of ind

  • DART 2.9 DART
  • RANK #262/1034
  • PHOTO Pine Crest Health Care
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~106 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pine Crest Health Care (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Afton Oaks Nursing and Rehab center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Afton Oaks Nursing and Rehab center averages 2.5 TCR (39% of the Group homes for the disabled with nursing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Afton Oaks Nursing and Rehab center TCR series: 2018=6.1 · 2019=2.6 · 2020=0 · 2021=1.1 · 2022=2.9 · BLS 6.5

Where Afton Oaks Nursing and Rehab center falls in its industry

15,252 Group homes for the disabled w establishments

Safer than 88% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #262 safest of 1034 Group homes for the disabled w employers in Texas.

Afton Oaks Nursing and Rehab center (106 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Afton Oaks Nursing and Rehab center
Afton Oaks Nursing and Rehab center (106 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Afton Oaks Nursing and Rehab center has more employees than the Group homes for the disabled with nursin median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 2.9 2.9 2 0 0
2021 1.1 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.6 1.8 3 0 0
2018 6.1 1.7 6 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · TX · Houston

15,252 Group homes for the disabled with nursing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 5,116 employers in Houston, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pine Crest Health Care 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kaleida Health - Highpointe 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 495 MADISON CENTER - WV 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Physical Rehab and Wellness Center of Spartanburg 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Dallas (TGM) 106 FTE
STATE-SIZE CenterPoint Energy - Ft Bend 106 FTE
STATE-SIZE CenterPoint Energy - Katy Electric Service Center 106 FTE
STATE-SIZE BMWC Constructors Gulf Coast, Inc. 106 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH IAH 11,560 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH - Airport United Airlines Offices 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-IAH 9,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Methodist Hospital Texas Medical Center 8,873 FTE
NAT-TCR Atlanta Container 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Northside Healthcare 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 239 - Canton-OH 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Tops #362 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lunds & Byerlys, Bloomington 106 FTE
NAT-SIZE Witmer's Feed & Grain Inc 106 FTE
NAT-SIZE McLeod Health and Fitness Center 106 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lunds & Byerlys, Richfield 106 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.