Glass products (except packaging containers) made from purchased glass · Florida

AG Oldcastle Building Envelope Miami

Miami, FL · ~124 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

AG Oldcastle Building Envelope Miami runs at 42% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Glass products (except packaging containers) made from purchased glass workplace, earning a grade A.

AG Oldcastle Building Envelope Miami: 1.4 TCR = 42% of Glass products (except packaging containers) made from purchased glass BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

AG Oldcastle Building Envelope Miami safety composite

AG Oldcastle Building Envelope Miami scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.7

2023→2024

AG Oldcastle Building Envelope Miami injury rate improved

AG Oldcastle Building Envelope Miami's TCR fell 2.7 from 2.7 in 2023 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 2.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=2.7 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 327215 · Miami, FL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 42% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/22
  • PHOTO Potters Industries -…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~124 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Potters Industries - Potsdam NY (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

AG Oldcastle Building Envelope Miami in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows AG Oldcastle Building Envelope Miami averages 1.4 TCR (42% of the Glass products (except packaging containers) made from purchased glass BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

AG Oldcastle Building Envelope Miami TCR series: 2023=2.7 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where AG Oldcastle Building Envelope Miami falls in its industry

441 Glass products (except packagi establishments

Safer than 83% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 22 Glass products (except packagi employers in Florida.

AG Oldcastle Building Envelope Miami (124 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 94 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate AG Oldcastle Building Envelope Miami
AG Oldcastle Building Envelope Miami (124 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 94 employees and a TCR of 3.3

AG Oldcastle Building Envelope Miami has more employees than the Glass products (except packaging contain median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 2.7 2.7 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

327215 · FL · Miami

441 Glass products (except packaging containers) made from purchased glass employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 1,467 employers in Miami, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Potters Industries - Potsdam NY 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rayotek 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Trulite Fort Worth 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Galt CG 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Treesap Farms LLC - Bunnell 124 FTE
STATE-SIZE CMR CONSTRUCTION ROOFING, LLC-FL 124 FTE
STATE-SIZE FTE Network Services 124 FTE
STATE-SIZE BAS 124 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-MIA-MIAMI-MIA-TRML 9,259 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baptist Hospital of Miami Inc. 6,876 FTE
CITY-NEAR MIACX0UPS MIA UPS 3,101 FTE
CITY-NEAR Office of Field Operations - Miami 2,879 FTE
NAT-TCR Pollack Center 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Procon 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Eagle Building 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Nampa ID DI 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Goldfinch Brothers, Inc. 124 FTE
NAT-SIZE Haag-Streit USA 124 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hendersonville Health and Rehabilitation 124 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hyatt Regency Cleveland at The Arcade 124 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.