Signs and signboards (except paper, paperboard) manufacturing · Ohio

Agile Sign & Lighting Maintenance, Inc

Eastlake, OH · ~20 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Agile Sign & Lighting Maintenance, Inc runs at 302% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Signs and signboards (except paper, paperboard) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Agile Sign & Lighting Maintenance, Inc: 10.0 TCR = 302% of Signs and signboards (except paper, paperboard) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Agile Sign & Lighting Maintenance, Inc safety composite

Agile Sign & Lighting Maintenance, Inc scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−24.9

2016→2019

Agile Sign & Lighting Maintenance, Inc injury rate improved

Agile Sign & Lighting Maintenance, Inc's TCR fell 24.9 from 24.9 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 24.9 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=24.9 · 2018=5.0 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 339950 · Eastlake, OH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.0 · 302% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #20/22
  • PHOTO EPNM Inc / Zeon Signs
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~20 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: EPNM Inc / Zeon Signs (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Agile Sign & Lighting Maintenance, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Agile Sign & Lighting Maintenance, Inc averages 10.0 TCR (302% of the Signs and signboards (except paper, paperboard) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Agile Sign & Lighting Maintenance, Inc TCR series: 2016=24.9 · 2018=5 · 2019=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Agile Sign & Lighting Maintenance, Inc falls in its industry

405 Signs and signboards (except p establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #20 safest of 22 Signs and signboards (except p employers in Ohio.

Agile Sign & Lighting Maintenance, Inc (20 employees, TCR 10.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Agile Sign & Lighting Maintenance, Inc
Agile Sign & Lighting Maintenance, Inc (20 employees, TCR 10.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Agile Sign & Lighting Maintenance, Inc has fewer employees than the Signs and signboards (except paper, pape median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 5.0 5.0 1 0 0
2016 24.9 24.9 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

339950 · OH · Eastlake

405 Signs and signboards (except paper, paperboard) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 31 employers in Eastlake, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR EPNM Inc / Zeon Signs 9.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sign Innovation 9.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR DaNite Holdings LTD 10.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Antigo Neon, LLC 10.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Nature Pure Farm 1 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Foundry Sand Service LLC 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Carroll County Energy LLC 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE NAES : NTE Middletown 20 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1863 341 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1863 335 FTE
CITY-NEAR Conn Selmer (Eastlake) 241 FTE
CITY-NEAR Best Supply, Inc. 218 FTE
NAT-TCR Aquatica 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Clarkson Apartments 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Heatherwood RI LLC 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Frattallone's Ace Hardware-Circle Pines 10.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Superior Mechanical Service 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Meadow Gold Billings - Billings - Sugar Ave 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE T.G. Lee - Jacksonville - DTI 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE BCS - Williston 20 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.