Gas tanks assembled, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing · North Carolina

Agility Fuel Solutions - Salisbury

Salisbury, NC · ~157 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Agility Fuel Solutions - Salisbury runs at 41% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Gas tanks assembled, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Agility Fuel Solutions - Salisbury: 2.2 TCR = 41% of Gas tanks assembled, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing BLS 5.4 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Agility Fuel Solutions - Salisbury safety composite

Agility Fuel Solutions - Salisbury scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 89% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 89% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.2

2016→2021

Agility Fuel Solutions - Salisbury injury rate improved

Agility Fuel Solutions - Salisbury's TCR fell 3.2 from 4.7 in 2016 to 1.5 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2016 at 4.7 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.7 · 2018=2.1 · 2019=0.6 · 2021=1.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336390 · Salisbury, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 2.2 · 41% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #10/24
  • PHOTO Sanden International…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~157 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sanden International (USA) Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Agility Fuel Solutions - Salisbury in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Agility Fuel Solutions - Salisbury averages 2.2 TCR (41% of the Gas tanks assembled, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Agility Fuel Solutions - Salisbury TCR series: 2016=4.7 · 2018=2.1 · 2019=0.6 · 2021=1.5 · BLS 5.4

Where Agility Fuel Solutions - Salisbury falls in its industry

772 Gas tanks assembled, automotiv establishments

Safer than 67% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 24 Gas tanks assembled, automotiv employers in North Carolina.

Agility Fuel Solutions - Salisbury (157 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 154 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Agility Fuel Solutions - Salisbury
Agility Fuel Solutions - Salisbury (157 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 154 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Agility Fuel Solutions - Salisbury has more employees than the Gas tanks assembled, automotive, truck, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 1.5 0.0 4 0 0
2019 0.6 0.0 1 0 0
2018 2.1 0.0 3 0 0
2016 4.7 4.7 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336390 · NC · Salisbury

772 Gas tanks assembled, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 180 employers in Salisbury, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sanden International (USA) Inc. 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gestamp McCalla 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Shaw Development, LLC - Bernwood Drive Location 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Advanced Filtration Systems Inc 2.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Highland 157 FTE
STATE-SIZE JPS Composite Materials Corporation 157 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wm. T. Burnett & Co., Nonwovens Division - Statesville 157 FTE
STATE-SIZE Giles Chemical Repack Facility 157 FTE
CITY-NEAR CSCEXC 1,314 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Rowan Medical Center 1,176 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rowan County Government 1,151 FTE
CITY-NEAR CLT1 973 FTE
NAT-TCR Indiana University Health Tipton Hospital 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Herr Foods Inc 61 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Office 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Munoz Rivera Centro de Servicios 1130 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE US188: Houston 430 - SG 157 FTE
NAT-SIZE Care-A-Lot Pet Supply Retail 157 FTE
NAT-SIZE Huntley Park District REC Center 157 FTE
NAT-SIZE Assisted Living 157 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.