Farm Labor Contractor · California

Agricultural Computerized Technology Inc

Oxnard, CA · ~655 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.9
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Agricultural Computerized Technology Inc runs at 176% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Farm Labor Contractor workplace, earning a grade D.

Agricultural Computerized Technology Inc: 7.9 TCR = 176% of Farm Labor Contractor BLS 4.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Agricultural Computerized Technology Inc safety composite

Agricultural Computerized Technology Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Agricultural Computerized Technology Inc: 2.2 → 8.5 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 11594.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.52× in 2024

Agricultural Computerized Technology Inc's TCR rose 6.3 from 2.2 in 2017 to 8.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 11594.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.52× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 115115 · Oxnard, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 7.9 · 176% of ind

  • DART 4.1 DART
  • RANK #497/620
  • PHOTO KLEEN HARVEST
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 162 inj
  • SIZE ~655 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: KLEEN HARVEST (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Agricultural Computerized Technology Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Agricultural Computerized Technology Inc averages 7.9 TCR (176% of the Farm Labor Contractor BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Agricultural Computerized Technology Inc TCR series: 2017=2.2 · 2018=12.6 · 2020=11594.2 · 2021=9.4 · 2022=6.6 · 2023=8.3 · 2024=8.5 · BLS 4.5

Where Agricultural Computerized Technology Inc falls in its industry

836 Farm Labor Contractor establishments

Safer than 20% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #497 safest of 620 Farm Labor Contractor employers in California.

Agricultural Computerized Technology Inc (655 employees, TCR 7.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 107 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Agricultural Computerized Technology Inc
Agricultural Computerized Technology Inc (655 employees, TCR 7.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 107 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Agricultural Computerized Technology Inc has more employees than the Farm Labor Contractor median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.5 4.1 16 15 0
2023 8.3 7.1 20 2 0
2022 6.6 6.0 20 2 0
2021 9.4 6.3 26 1 0
2020 11594.2 8333.3 22 10 0
2018 12.6 8.2 30 4 0
2017 2.2 1.8 28 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

115115 · CA · Oxnard

836 Farm Labor Contractor employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 303 employers in Oxnard, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR KLEEN HARVEST 7.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Adobe Creek Orchards 7.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR MGM LABOR CONTRACTING INC 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR RC PACKING -HURON 8.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Unifi Aviation Services : LAX - Los Angeles 654 FTE
STATE-SIZE St. Andrew 656 FTE
STATE-SIZE Meridian Gardens of Riverside 654 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4263-26428 656 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - OXR1 2,474 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Oxnard 1,753 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030383 1,437 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. John's Regional Medical Center 1,352 FTE
NAT-TCR AOI 7.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Shaheen Chevrolet, Inc. 7.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - DHX1 7.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Fun Spot Manufacturing, LLC 7.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cleveland-Cliffs - Weirton 655 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lithia Springs, GA - Sydney Ct 655 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stickney WRP 655 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fountain Inn 655 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.