General-purpose industrial machinery and equipment merchant wholesalers · Minnesota

Air Automation & Engineering, Inc.

Fridley, MN · ~26 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Air Automation & Engineering, Inc. runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical General-purpose industrial machinery and equipment merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade C.

Air Automation & Engineering, Inc.: 0.0 TCR = 0% of General-purpose industrial machinery and equipment merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Air Automation & Engineering, Inc. safety composite

Air Automation & Engineering, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Air Automation & Engineering, Inc. held a steady TCR band

Air Automation & Engineering, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 0.0 TCR.

2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423830 · Fridley, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/16
  • PHOTO Corporate
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~26 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Corporate (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Air Automation & Engineering, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Air Automation & Engineering, Inc. averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the General-purpose industrial machinery and equipment merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Air Automation & Engineering, Inc. TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 2.2

Where Air Automation & Engineering, Inc. falls in its industry

911 General-purpose industrial mac establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 16 General-purpose industrial mac employers in Minnesota.

Air Automation & Engineering, Inc. (26 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Air Automation & Engineering, Inc.
Air Automation & Engineering, Inc. (26 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Air Automation & Engineering, Inc. has fewer employees than the General-purpose industrial machinery and median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423830 · MN · Fridley

911 General-purpose industrial machinery and equipment merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 134 employers in Fridley, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Corporate 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cameron 4646 W Sam Houston Parkway N 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR US TX Houston 7402 N Eldridge Pkwy/Firebrick 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR SOUTHERN OPERATIONS 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Becker 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Silverstreak Dairy LLC, Silverstreak Dairy 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Schwartz Farms Huiras MN 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Golden Egg 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR Unity Hospital 3,053 FTE
CITY-NEAR Operational Headquarters 1,637 FTE
CITY-NEAR US, MN Fridley, Cummins Power Systems 1,451 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cummins Power Systems - Fridley 1,183 FTE
NAT-TCR 1655 3rd St,San Francisco (MB3 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Kinship Pointe Seward 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Carbro Constructors Corp Main 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Chicago Corporate 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Brookdale Hixson 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Monosem, LLC 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE L.J. Construction, Inc. 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE P&P Transportation (KY DOCK) 26 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.