Air passenger carriers, scheduled · California

Air New Zealand LTD LAX Regional Office

El Segundo, CA · ~27 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.1
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Air New Zealand LTD LAX Regional Office runs at 68% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Air passenger carriers, scheduled workplace, earning a grade B.

Air New Zealand LTD LAX Regional Office: 3.1 TCR = 68% of Air passenger carriers, scheduled BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Air New Zealand LTD LAX Regional Office safety composite

Air New Zealand LTD LAX Regional Office scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 91% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.2

2022→2024

Air New Zealand LTD LAX Regional Office injury rate improved

Air New Zealand LTD LAX Regional Office's TCR fell 9.2 from 9.2 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 9.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=9.2 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 481111 · El Segundo, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 3.1 · 68% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #36/177
  • PHOTO Endeavor Air, Inc. -…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~27 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Endeavor Air, Inc. - DTW Flight Operations and Inflight Base (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Air New Zealand LTD LAX Regional Office in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Air New Zealand LTD LAX Regional Office averages 3.1 TCR (68% of the Air passenger carriers, scheduled BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Air New Zealand LTD LAX Regional Office TCR series: 2022=9.2 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Air New Zealand LTD LAX Regional Office falls in its industry

1,568 Air passenger carriers, schedu establishments

Safer than 73% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #36 safest of 177 Air passenger carriers, schedu employers in California.

Air New Zealand LTD LAX Regional Office (27 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 6.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Air New Zealand LTD LAX Regional Office
Air New Zealand LTD LAX Regional Office (27 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 6.1

Air New Zealand LTD LAX Regional Office has fewer employees than the Air passenger carriers, scheduled median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 9.2 4.6 0 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

481111 · CA · El Segundo

1,568 Air passenger carriers, scheduled employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 121 employers in El Segundo, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Endeavor Air, Inc. - DTW Flight Operations and Inflight Base 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Endeavor Air, Inc. - TYS Tech Ops 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4795-PD-HVN-NEW HAVEN-HVN-PDMT 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Delta Air Lines - SRQ 3.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE HQ 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Medeiros Farms Vineyards 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE SAND RANCH 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE San Bernabe Vineyards 27 FTE
CITY-NEAR Raytheon_El Segundo_CA 5,443 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA011 3,282 FTE
CITY-NEAR NGAS-A113 2,490 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northrup Grumman Systems Corporation 1,934 FTE
NAT-TCR Lafayette Worwag 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR New Miami 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Katahdin Valley Health Center, Dover-Foxcroft 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Water/Public Works, Public Utiities 3.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Gateway Air Conditioning Sheet and Metal 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE JAL-DFW 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE AMI Aviation Services 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Party Reflections COL 27 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.