Aircraft manufacturing · Alabama

Airbus U.S. Manufacturing Facility - Final Assembly Line

Mobile, AL · ~573 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Airbus U.S. Manufacturing Facility - Final Assembly Line runs at 50% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Aircraft manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Airbus U.S. Manufacturing Facility - Final Assembly Line: 1.7 TCR = 50% of Aircraft manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Airbus U.S. Manufacturing Facility - Final Assembly Line safety composite

Airbus U.S. Manufacturing Facility - Final Assembly Line scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.8

2016→2020

Airbus U.S. Manufacturing Facility - Final Assembly Line injury rate improved

Airbus U.S. Manufacturing Facility - Final Assembly Line's TCR fell 1.8 from 3.0 in 2016 to 1.2 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3.0 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.6× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.0 · 2017=0.8 · 2020=1.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336411 · Mobile, AL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.7 · 50% of ind

  • DART 1.0 DART
  • RANK #7/10
  • PHOTO AgustaWestland Phila…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~573 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: AgustaWestland Philadelphia Corporation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

Airbus U.S. Manufacturing Facility - Final Assembly Line in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Airbus U.S. Manufacturing Facility - Final Assembly Line averages 1.7 TCR (50% of the Aircraft manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Airbus U.S. Manufacturing Facility - Final Assembly Line TCR series: 2016=3 · 2017=0.8 · 2020=1.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Airbus U.S. Manufacturing Facility - Final Assembly Line falls in its industry

390 Aircraft manufacturing establishments

Safer than 51% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 10 Aircraft manufacturing employers in Alabama.

Airbus U.S. Manufacturing Facility - Final Assembly Line (573 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 151 employees and a TCR of 1.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,00010,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Airbus U.S. Manufacturing Facility - Final Assembly Line
Airbus U.S. Manufacturing Facility - Final Assembly Line (573 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 151 employees and a TCR of 1.7

Airbus U.S. Manufacturing Facility - Final Assembly Line has more employees than the Aircraft manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 1.2 1.0 8 3 0
2017 0.8 0.8 3 0 0
2016 3.0 2.1 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336411 · AL · Mobile

390 Aircraft manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 505 employers in Mobile, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR AgustaWestland Philadelphia Corporation 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Meggitt Orange County Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Textron Aviation - Mid Continent 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR NV002 1.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Marathon Electrical Contractors, LLC 575 FTE
STATE-SIZE Koch Foods of AL Debone 570 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rainsville Technology Inc 568 FTE
STATE-SIZE Blox LLC 581 FTE
CITY-NEAR MOBILE PACKERS 8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR Austal USA LLC 3,377 FTE
CITY-NEAR MOBILE INFIRMARY 2,116 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hargrove Engineers and Constructors 1,949 FTE
NAT-TCR 40150 - Capstone Family Dollar Memphis Ar 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Corporate Office 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Providence Health - EVS 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #422 YPSILANTI, MI 1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Amzl : Drc1 573 FTE
NAT-SIZE DENSO Manufacturing Arkansas 573 FTE
NAT-SIZE JVS 573 FTE
NAT-SIZE Corporate Headquarters 573 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.