Gases, industrial (i.e., compressed, liquefied, solid), manufacturing · Georgia

Airgas Dry Ice - Augusta

Augusta, GA · ~55 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Airgas Dry Ice - Augusta runs at 23% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Gases, industrial (i.e., compressed, liquefied, solid), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Airgas Dry Ice - Augusta: 0.8 TCR = 23% of Gases, industrial (i.e., compressed, liquefied, solid), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Airgas Dry Ice - Augusta safety composite

Airgas Dry Ice - Augusta scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Airgas Dry Ice - Augusta: 0.0 → 2.1 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 2.4 TCR · DART/TCR 2.85× in 2021

Airgas Dry Ice - Augusta's TCR rose 2.1 from 0.0 in 2016 to 2.1 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 2.4 TCR. In 2021, DART was 2.85× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325120 · Augusta, GA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 23% of ind

  • DART 2.1 DART
  • RANK #1/7
  • PHOTO Linde 929
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~55 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Linde 929 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Airgas Dry Ice - Augusta in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Airgas Dry Ice - Augusta averages 0.8 TCR (23% of the Gases, industrial (i.e., compressed, liquefied, solid), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Airgas Dry Ice - Augusta TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=2.4 · 2020=0 · 2021=2.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Airgas Dry Ice - Augusta falls in its industry

295 Gases, industrial (i.e., compr establishments

Safer than 80% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 7 Gases, industrial (i.e., compr employers in Georgia.

Airgas Dry Ice - Augusta (55 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 020406080100120 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Airgas Dry Ice - Augusta
Airgas Dry Ice - Augusta (55 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Airgas Dry Ice - Augusta has more employees than the Gases, industrial (i.e., compressed, liq median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 2.1 2.1 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.4 1.2 2 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325120 · GA · Augusta

295 Gases, industrial (i.e., compressed, liquefied, solid), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 373 employers in Augusta, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Linde 929 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Air Products and Chemicals Inc.- Oak Creek Facility 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR HoneywellLA07BTR 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Linde Kansas City 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Ofi Peanut Shelling Co. Rochelle 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Atlanta Corporate Headquartes 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Klondike Training Center 4826 Klondike Rd Lithonia 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Three Notch Electric Membership Corporation 55 FTE
CITY-NEAR AUGUSTA COKE 9,165 FTE
CITY-NEAR AUGUSTA FOOD 8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR AUGUSTA PACKERS 8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR AU Medical Center, Inc. 5,630 FTE
NAT-TCR Heat Transfer Solutions Texas 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR *Einstein Plaza Jenkintown 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Energy Center Phoenix 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Dolet Hills Power Station 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE High Country Line 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Avamere at Cascadia Village 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sacramento 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Farming Administration 55 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.