Fans, industrial and commercial-type, manufacturing · Wisconsin

AirPro Fan and Blower Co. - North

Rhinelander, WI · ~53 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

AirPro Fan and Blower Co. - North runs at 345% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Fans, industrial and commercial-type, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

AirPro Fan and Blower Co. - North: 11.4 TCR = 345% of Fans, industrial and commercial-type, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

AirPro Fan and Blower Co. - North safety composite

AirPro Fan and Blower Co. - North scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

AirPro Fan and Blower Co. - North: 10.8 → 11.9 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 11.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.17× in 2022

AirPro Fan and Blower Co. - North's TCR rose 1.1 from 10.8 in 2021 to 11.9 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 0.17× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333413 · Rhinelander, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.4 · 345% of ind

  • DART 2.0 DART
  • RANK #20/20
  • PHOTO Chisholm, Boyd & Whi…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~53 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Chisholm, Boyd & White/Scientific Dust Collectors (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

AirPro Fan and Blower Co. - North in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows AirPro Fan and Blower Co. - North averages 11.4 TCR (345% of the Fans, industrial and commercial-type, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

AirPro Fan and Blower Co. - North TCR series: 2021=10.8 · 2022=11.9 · BLS 3.3

Where AirPro Fan and Blower Co. - North falls in its industry

232 Fans, industrial and commercia establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #20 safest of 20 Fans, industrial and commercia employers in Wisconsin.

AirPro Fan and Blower Co. - North (53 employees, TCR 11.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 85 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate AirPro Fan and Blower Co. - North
AirPro Fan and Blower Co. - North (53 employees, TCR 11.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 85 employees and a TCR of 3.1

AirPro Fan and Blower Co. - North has fewer employees than the Fans, industrial and commercial-type, ma median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 11.9 2.0 4 2 0
2021 10.8 8.7 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333413 · WI · Rhinelander

232 Fans, industrial and commercial-type, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 52 employers in Rhinelander, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Chisholm, Boyd & White/Scientific Dust Collectors 11.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookings Insbrook 11.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR BasX Solutions 11.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Robinson Fans Florida 12.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Coello & Associates, inc. 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Clearwing Systems Integration, LLC 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Robert J. Nickles, Inc 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE NSI Electrical Contractors, Inc 53 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aspirus Rhinelander Hospital 583 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4538-9301 515 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rhinelander Mill 462 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1855-WIAPP006 448 FTE
NAT-TCR HG583 11.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Heartis Longview 11.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Perdue Inc 11.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 3495-11DA097 11.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Weibel Family Winery 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1221 Fairview Park 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1174 Wasilla 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1107 Peoria 53 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.