Continuing Care Retirement Communities · Alaska

Ak27 Providence Seward Mountain Haven-Seward

Seward, AK · ~52 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ak27 Providence Seward Mountain Haven-Seward runs at 321% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Continuing Care Retirement Communities workplace, earning a grade F.

Ak27 Providence Seward Mountain Haven-Seward: 12.2 TCR = 321% of Continuing Care Retirement Communities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ak27 Providence Seward Mountain Haven-Seward safety composite

Ak27 Providence Seward Mountain Haven-Seward scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Ak27 Providence Seward Mountain Haven-Seward: 9.4 → 15.0 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 15.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.31× in 2024

Ak27 Providence Seward Mountain Haven-Seward's TCR rose 5.5 from 9.4 in 2023 to 15.0 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.31× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Seward, AK ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 12.2 · 321% of ind

  • DART 3.8 DART
  • RANK #3/5
  • PHOTO Lawton Senior Living
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~52 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lawton Senior Living (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alaska employers → · Look up another →

Ak27 Providence Seward Mountain Haven-Seward in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ak27 Providence Seward Mountain Haven-Seward averages 12.2 TCR (321% of the Continuing Care Retirement Communities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ak27 Providence Seward Mountain Haven-Seward TCR series: 2023=9.4 · 2024=15 · BLS 3.8

Where Ak27 Providence Seward Mountain Haven-Seward falls in its industry

4,127 Continuing Care Retirement Com establishments

Safer than 20% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alaska alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 5 Continuing Care Retirement Com employers in Alaska.

Ak27 Providence Seward Mountain Haven-Seward (52 employees, TCR 12.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Ak27 Providence Seward Mountain Haven-Seward
Ak27 Providence Seward Mountain Haven-Seward (52 employees, TCR 12.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Ak27 Providence Seward Mountain Haven-Seward has fewer employees than the Continuing Care Retirement Communities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 15.0 3.8 7 1 0
2023 9.4 7.1 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · AK · Seward

4,127 Continuing Care Retirement Communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,558 rated employers in Alaska with headcount on file · 17 employers in Seward, AK · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lawton Senior Living 12.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Legend of Lititz 12.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Park Place of Fountain City 12.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Peachtree 2 12.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Glacier Oil and Gas Corp 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pruhs Construction Company 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE North Slope Telecom, Inc. 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE BrandSafway Services, LLC - BPXA North Slope Refinery 52 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2252-00000110 189 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dept. of Corrections (30) 161 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dept. of Corrections (31) 151 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6400-SWY-0027-0027-02728 90 FTE
NAT-TCR Charlottesville - Fire 12.2 TCR
NAT-TCR SunRype Concentrates, Inc. 12.2 TCR
NAT-TCR EB Arbors at Ridges 12.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Cambridge Care Center LLC 12.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE CPK-NJ 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Perryton 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Galveston County 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE rad mfg llc 52 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.