Junction boxes, electrical wiring, manufacturing · Ohio

Akron Electric, Inc.

Barberton, OH · ~38 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Akron Electric, Inc. runs at 135% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Junction boxes, electrical wiring, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Akron Electric, Inc.: 4.4 TCR = 135% of Junction boxes, electrical wiring, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Akron Electric, Inc. safety composite

Akron Electric, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 28%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.4

2016→2024

Akron Electric, Inc. injury rate improved

Akron Electric, Inc.'s TCR fell 9.4 from 9.4 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 9.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=9.4 · 2018=7.5 · 2019=8.1 · 2020=5.3 · 2021=2.7 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=2.6 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 335932 · Barberton, OH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.4 · 135% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #7/7
  • PHOTO Electri-Flex Company
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Electri-Flex Company (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Akron Electric, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Akron Electric, Inc. averages 4.4 TCR (135% of the Junction boxes, electrical wiring, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Akron Electric, Inc. TCR series: 2016=9.4 · 2018=7.5 · 2019=8.1 · 2020=5.3 · 2021=2.7 · 2022=0 · 2023=2.6 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Akron Electric, Inc. falls in its industry

71 Junction boxes, electrical wir establishments

Safer than 28% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 7 Junction boxes, electrical wir employers in Ohio.

Akron Electric, Inc. (38 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 110 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Akron Electric, Inc.
Akron Electric, Inc. (38 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 110 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Akron Electric, Inc. has fewer employees than the Junction boxes, electrical wiring, manuf median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 2.6 2.6 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 2.7 2.7 1 0 0
2020 5.3 2.7 2 0 0
2019 8.1 8.1 3 0 0
2018 7.5 2.5 3 0 0
2016 9.4 2.4 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

335932 · OH · Barberton

71 Junction boxes, electrical wiring, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 58 employers in Barberton, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Electri-Flex Company 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR PCORE ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC -REUEL PLANT 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR All-States, Inc. 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hubbell RACO 4.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Verano OH CPG - Mothers Grow Best 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Green Velvet Sod Farms 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pride Transportation Co, Inc 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Union City 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR Barberton Campus 888 FTE
CITY-NEAR BWX Technologies, Inc. Nuclear Operations Group - Barberton 825 FTE
CITY-NEAR BWX Technologies, LLC 737 FTE
CITY-NEAR S.A. Comunale - Norton 612 FTE
NAT-TCR J&K Earthworks, LLC 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Alry Tool & Die Co., Inc. 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 2584 - Sunnyvale 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 1540 - Kalispell 4.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Overhead Door Company of Central Virginia 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lincoln Lumber Corrigan, LLC 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cascade Petroleum Transportation 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bissell Mexico inc Pharr 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.