Architectural coatings (i.e., paint) manufacturing · North Carolina

AkzoNobel High Point

High Point, NC · ~244 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

AkzoNobel High Point runs at 31% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Architectural coatings (i.e., paint) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

AkzoNobel High Point: 1.0 TCR = 31% of Architectural coatings (i.e., paint) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

AkzoNobel High Point safety composite

AkzoNobel High Point scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.8

2016→2022

AkzoNobel High Point injury rate improved

AkzoNobel High Point's TCR fell 0.8 from 1.2 in 2016 to 0.5 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 1.9 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.2 · 2017=0.3 · 2018=0.6 · 2019=1.9 · 2020=1.2 · 2021=1.4 · 2022=0.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325510 · High Point, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.0 · 31% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/23
  • PHOTO USA NC Greensboro Ho…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~244 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: USA NC Greensboro Howard Street Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

AkzoNobel High Point in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows AkzoNobel High Point averages 1.0 TCR (31% of the Architectural coatings (i.e., paint) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

AkzoNobel High Point TCR series: 2016=1.2 · 2017=0.3 · 2018=0.6 · 2019=1.9 · 2020=1.2 · 2021=1.4 · 2022=0.5 · BLS 3.3

Where AkzoNobel High Point falls in its industry

530 Architectural coatings (i.e., establishments

Safer than 85% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 23 Architectural coatings (i.e., employers in North Carolina.

AkzoNobel High Point (244 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate AkzoNobel High Point
AkzoNobel High Point (244 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 2.5

AkzoNobel High Point has more employees than the Architectural coatings (i.e., paint) man median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.5 0.0 0 1 0
2021 1.4 1.4 3 0 0
2020 1.2 1.2 3 0 0
2019 1.9 1.9 5 1 0
2018 0.6 0.3 0 2 0
2017 0.3 0.3 1 0 0
2016 1.2 0.9 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325510 · NC · High Point

530 Architectural coatings (i.e., paint) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 243 employers in High Point, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR USA NC Greensboro Howard Street Plant 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR USA IL Rockford Nelson Boulevard Plant 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR US IL Rockford Plant 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Channel 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Wilkesboro Fresh Plant II 244 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cardinal FG -Mooresville FG 244 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ziehl-Abegg 244 FTE
STATE-SIZE Penco Products Inc 244 FTE
CITY-NEAR WFBMC - High Point Medical Center 1,936 FTE
CITY-NEAR CITY OF HIGH POINT 1,532 FTE
CITY-NEAR Thomas Built Buses 1,467 FTE
CITY-NEAR High Point Medical Center 1,370 FTE
NAT-TCR Plaza Construction DC 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Phoenix Houses of Texas - Houston 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Marshall TX PP 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Guilford Free Library 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Diamond Electric WV 244 FTE
NAT-SIZE 55497 Union County 244 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Superior Group LLC 244 FTE
NAT-SIZE Harper Brothers Construction 244 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.