Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction · California

Alameda Construction Services, Inc.

Compton, CA · ~60 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
5.9
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Alameda Construction Services, Inc. runs at 211% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction workplace, earning a grade F.

Alameda Construction Services, Inc.: 5.9 TCR = 211% of Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Alameda Construction Services, Inc. safety composite

Alameda Construction Services, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.2

2023→2024

Alameda Construction Services, Inc. injury rate improved

Alameda Construction Services, Inc.'s TCR fell 2.2 from 7.0 in 2023 to 4.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 7.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.81× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=7.0 · 2024=4.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237310 · Compton, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 5.9 · 211% of ind

  • DART 4.8 DART
  • RANK #496/551
  • PHOTO Infrastructure FHC
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~60 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Infrastructure FHC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Alameda Construction Services, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Alameda Construction Services, Inc. averages 5.9 TCR (211% of the Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Alameda Construction Services, Inc. TCR series: 2023=7 · 2024=4.8 · BLS 2.8

Where Alameda Construction Services, Inc. falls in its industry

4,078 Pavement, highway, road, stree establishments

Safer than 23% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #496 safest of 551 Pavement, highway, road, stree employers in California.

Alameda Construction Services, Inc. (60 employees, TCR 5.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Alameda Construction Services, Inc.
Alameda Construction Services, Inc. (60 employees, TCR 5.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Alameda Construction Services, Inc. has fewer employees than the Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.8 4.8 2 0 0
2023 7.0 7.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237310 · CA · Compton

4,078 Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 143 employers in Compton, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Infrastructure FHC 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR LAWS Construction Corp. 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Allen Company, Inc 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hardrives Construction, Inc. 5.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE North Coast Vineyards 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sun Pacific Farming Cooperative, Inc | Grapes Delano 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Paiva Farm Management 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rocket Farms Herbs Inc Thermal 60 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ono-017 910 FTE
CITY-NEAR 430-DC006 793 FTE
CITY-NEAR 430-DC001 789 FTE
CITY-NEAR The People Concern - SOLAR 448 FTE
NAT-TCR Nybin - Binghamton 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Lanib - New Iberia 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR States Industries 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Giant Food Stores 6255 5.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Conduit Pipe Products 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE EMS - Stonehaven Sr Lvg 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Minneapolis 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE HyFlex Corporation 60 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.