Door, commercial- or industrial-type, installation · Texas

Alamo Door Systems, Inc.

Harlingen, TX · ~29 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.0
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Alamo Door Systems, Inc. runs at 322% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Door, commercial- or industrial-type, installation workplace, earning a grade F.

Alamo Door Systems, Inc.: 9.0 TCR = 322% of Door, commercial- or industrial-type, installation BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Alamo Door Systems, Inc. safety composite

Alamo Door Systems, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

17/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.3

2016→2024

Alamo Door Systems, Inc. injury rate improved

Alamo Door Systems, Inc.'s TCR fell 6.3 from 12.8 in 2016 to 6.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 19.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.72× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=12.8 · 2017=12.4 · 2018=9.3 · 2019=10.6 · 2020=3.2 · 2021=19.6 · 2022=3.6 · 2023=3.3 · 2024=6.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238290 · Harlingen, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.0 · 322% of ind

  • DART 6.5 DART
  • RANK #93/97
  • PHOTO Smith & Casady, Inc.
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 25 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Smith & Casady, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Alamo Door Systems, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Alamo Door Systems, Inc. averages 9.0 TCR (322% of the Door, commercial- or industrial-type, installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Alamo Door Systems, Inc. TCR series: 2016=12.8 · 2017=12.4 · 2018=9.3 · 2019=10.6 · 2020=3.2 · 2021=19.6 · 2022=3.6 · 2023=3.3 · 2024=6.5 · BLS 2.8

Where Alamo Door Systems, Inc. falls in its industry

1,138 Door, commercial- or industria establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #93 safest of 97 Door, commercial- or industria employers in Texas.

Alamo Door Systems, Inc. (29 employees, TCR 9.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Alamo Door Systems, Inc.
Alamo Door Systems, Inc. (29 employees, TCR 9.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Alamo Door Systems, Inc. has fewer employees than the Door, commercial- or industrial-type, in median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.5 6.5 2 0 0
2023 3.3 3.3 1 0 0
2022 3.6 0.0 1 0 0
2021 19.6 19.6 6 0 0
2020 3.2 3.2 1 0 0
2019 10.6 3.5 3 0 0
2018 9.3 9.3 3 0 0
2017 12.4 9.3 4 0 0
2016 12.8 9.6 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238290 · TX · Harlingen

1,138 Door, commercial- or industrial-type, installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 133 employers in Harlingen, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Smith & Casady, Inc. 9.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kois Brothers Equipment Co 9.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Atlantic Elevator North 9.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR L Cubed Corporation 8.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cobalt Cattle Company LLC - Hereford 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pepper Dairy 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE SROOC Holding LLC 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE G&G Logging, LLC 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4701-838 1,389 FTE
CITY-NEAR Harlingen Medical Center 661 FTE
CITY-NEAR TX_Harlingen_2921 S. Expswy 83_TCIP2T20 553 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 595 354 FTE
NAT-TCR 2046 - West St Paul 9.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - DCB8 9.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - SLC1 9.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - LIT2 9.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Redwood Falls Runnings 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wjc-Twc-Twc Wjc -Jacksonville Fl 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chemionics 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of White Plains-DPW Water Department 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.