General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) · New Mexico

Albuquerque Terminal

Albuquerque, NM · ~86 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Albuquerque Terminal runs at 54% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) workplace, earning a grade B.

Albuquerque Terminal: 2.4 TCR = 54% of General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) BLS 4.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Albuquerque Terminal safety composite

Albuquerque Terminal scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 68% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.3

2016→2024

Albuquerque Terminal injury rate improved

Albuquerque Terminal's TCR fell 2.3 from 3.1 in 2016 to 0.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 6.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.33× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.1 · 2017=0.0 · 2020=6.0 · 2021=1.3 · 2022=2.8 · 2023=3.1 · 2024=0.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484121 · Albuquerque, NM AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.4 · 54% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #4/8
  • PHOTO Cocoa Beach (Onsite …
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~86 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cocoa Beach (Onsite Walmart) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Mexico employers → · Look up another →

Albuquerque Terminal in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Albuquerque Terminal averages 2.4 TCR (54% of the General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Albuquerque Terminal TCR series: 2016=3.1 · 2017=0 · 2020=6 · 2021=1.3 · 2022=2.8 · 2023=3.1 · 2024=0.8 · BLS 4.5

Where Albuquerque Terminal falls in its industry

3,252 General freight trucking, long establishments

Safer than 61% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Mexico alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 8 General freight trucking, long employers in New Mexico.

Albuquerque Terminal (86 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Albuquerque Terminal
Albuquerque Terminal (86 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Albuquerque Terminal has more employees than the General freight trucking, long-distance, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2023 3.1 3.1 4 0 0
2022 2.8 2.1 3 1 0
2021 1.3 1.3 2 0 0
2020 6.0 4.3 7 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 3.1 3.1 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484121 · NM · Albuquerque

3,252 General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,241 rated employers in New Mexico with headcount on file · 944 employers in Albuquerque, NM · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cocoa Beach (Onsite Walmart) 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 300000170855211 - FL-Winter Haven-CSX Ramp Location 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 300000170856022 - TX-Houston-Operating Center 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR PRODUCE SUPPLY EXPRESS, INC. 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE CUSTOM GRADING, INC. 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE 3504 WEST ALBUQUERQUE 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE USM Store #691 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE NM-G 86 FTE
CITY-NEAR NM-01 4,429 FTE
CITY-NEAR Presbyterian Hospital 4,298 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cooper Administrative Center 3,531 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - ABQ1 1,917 FTE
NAT-TCR Aspen Beverages LTD, DBA Finlays 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Monday Night Brewing 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Diversified Builders Main 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR RotoCo - Call Center 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE CG Automation & Fixture INC 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE Otay Mesa Drop Yard 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE Globe Trailer Manufacturing, Inc. 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE Erie SC 86 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.