Homes for the elderly with nursing care · Illinois

Alden Des Plaines Courts and Gardens

Des Plaines, IL · ~33 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
5.5
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Alden Des Plaines Courts and Gardens runs at 84% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Homes for the elderly with nursing care workplace, earning a grade C.

Alden Des Plaines Courts and Gardens: 5.5 TCR = 84% of Homes for the elderly with nursing care BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Alden Des Plaines Courts and Gardens safety composite

Alden Des Plaines Courts and Gardens scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 61% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 46%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 5.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Alden Des Plaines Courts and Gardens held a steady TCR band

Alden Des Plaines Courts and Gardens's TCR held near 0.2 from 4.0 in 2016 to 3.9 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 8.5 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.7× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.0 · 2018=8.5 · 2021=3.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Des Plaines, IL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 5.5 · 84% of ind

  • DART 3.9 DART
  • RANK #338/857
  • PHOTO The Pines at Catskill
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Pines at Catskill (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Alden Des Plaines Courts and Gardens in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Alden Des Plaines Courts and Gardens averages 5.5 TCR (84% of the Homes for the elderly with nursing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Alden Des Plaines Courts and Gardens TCR series: 2016=4 · 2018=8.5 · 2021=3.9 · BLS 6.5

Where Alden Des Plaines Courts and Gardens falls in its industry

15,252 Homes for the elderly with nur establishments

Safer than 61% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #338 safest of 857 Homes for the elderly with nur employers in Illinois.

Alden Des Plaines Courts and Gardens (33 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Alden Des Plaines Courts and Gardens
Alden Des Plaines Courts and Gardens (33 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Alden Des Plaines Courts and Gardens has fewer employees than the Homes for the elderly with nursing care median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 3.9 3.9 0 1 0
2018 8.5 8.5 2 0 0
2016 4.0 4.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · IL · Des Plaines

15,252 Homes for the elderly with nursing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 174 employers in Des Plaines, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Pines at Catskill 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bethesda Health Care Center, Inc 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Windsor Care Center Petaluma 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Watertown SD Skilled Nursing Facility LLC 5.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE PharmaCann Dwight 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Konos 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mendota Farm Shop 208 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE NRG Will County Generating Station 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR Illinois Bone & Joint Institute 2,172 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rivers Casino 1,705 FTE
CITY-NEAR Des Plaines Campus 1,245 FTE
CITY-NEAR Des Plaines (IL36) 1,200 FTE
NAT-TCR MILFORD 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Performance Nashville - 0685 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 1350 - Oklahoma City Ok Whse 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR TDR Systems, Inc. 5.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE CCW - Carlisle 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE DB Schenker Shared (Lorex) 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Woodruff Cold Storage 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Woods Masonry 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.