Homes for the aged with nursing care · Minnesota

All Saints Senior Living

Shakopee, MN · ~64 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
20.4
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

All Saints Senior Living runs at 314% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Homes for the aged with nursing care workplace, earning a grade F.

All Saints Senior Living: 20.4 TCR = 314% of Homes for the aged with nursing care BLS 6.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

All Saints Senior Living safety composite

All Saints Senior Living scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

18/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 20.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
F 15.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

All Saints Senior Living: 3.8 → 31.9 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 78.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.78× in 2024

All Saints Senior Living's TCR rose 28.2 from 3.8 in 2018 to 31.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 78.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.78× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Shakopee, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 20.4 · 314% of ind

  • DART 16.0 DART
  • RANK #402/430
  • PHOTO Arc at Chillicothe
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 31 inj
  • SIZE ~64 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Arc at Chillicothe (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

All Saints Senior Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows All Saints Senior Living averages 20.4 TCR (314% of the Homes for the aged with nursing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

All Saints Senior Living TCR series: 2018=3.8 · 2019=5.6 · 2020=78.8 · 2021=36.5 · 2022=70.5 · 2023=24.1 · 2024=31.9 · BLS 6.5

Where All Saints Senior Living falls in its industry

15,252 Homes for the aged with nursin establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #402 safest of 430 Homes for the aged with nursin employers in Minnesota.

All Saints Senior Living (64 employees, TCR 20.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate All Saints Senior Living
All Saints Senior Living (64 employees, TCR 20.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

All Saints Senior Living has fewer employees than the Homes for the aged with nursing care median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 31.9 16.0 15 1 0
2023 24.1 12.0 7 3 0
2022 70.5 64.4 1 22 0
2021 36.5 36.5 3 12 0
2020 78.8 78.8 0 34 0
2019 5.6 0.0 3 0 0
2018 3.8 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · MN · Shakopee

15,252 Homes for the aged with nursing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 180 employers in Shakopee, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Arc at Chillicothe 20.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pinnacle Pionte Nursing and Rehab Center 20.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookwood Nursing Center, LLC dba Brookwood Skilled Nursing and Therapy 20.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Shandin Hills Behavioral Health Center 20.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE PILGRIMS PRIDE HATCHERIES 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Freeborn Mower Electric Cooperative 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nativity of the Blessed Virgin 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Thomas Grace Construction, Inc. 64 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - MSP1 2,298 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : MSP1 2,202 FTE
CITY-NEAR Entrust Corporation 1,448 FTE
CITY-NEAR Emerson Automation Solutions - Shakopee 1,350 FTE
NAT-TCR Torrance Marriott Redondo Beach 20.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Cosal - Salida 20.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0214 Claremont 20.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Hearthside Senior Living of Bartlett 20.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Children's Hopsital Colorado Therapy Care,Broomfield 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE HIX Corporation 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Midas Trucking 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE APX Enclosures, Inc. 64 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.