Duct work (e.g., cooling, dust collection, exhaust, heating, ventilation) installation · Texas

All Seasons Feeders, Ltd

San Antonio, TX · ~58 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
5.9
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

All Seasons Feeders, Ltd runs at 211% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Duct work (e.g., cooling, dust collection, exhaust, heating, ventilation) installation workplace, earning a grade F.

All Seasons Feeders, Ltd: 5.9 TCR = 211% of Duct work (e.g., cooling, dust collection, exhaust, heating, ventilation) installation BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

All Seasons Feeders, Ltd safety composite

All Seasons Feeders, Ltd scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.2

2018→2019

All Seasons Feeders, Ltd injury rate improved

All Seasons Feeders, Ltd's TCR fell 2.2 from 7.0 in 2018 to 4.8 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 7.0 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.54× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=7.0 · 2019=4.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · San Antonio, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 5.9 · 211% of ind

  • DART 3.2 DART
  • RANK #333/408
  • PHOTO Steg Plumbing LLC
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~58 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Steg Plumbing LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

All Seasons Feeders, Ltd in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows All Seasons Feeders, Ltd averages 5.9 TCR (211% of the Duct work (e.g., cooling, dust collection, exhaust, heating, ventilation) installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

All Seasons Feeders, Ltd TCR series: 2018=7 · 2019=4.8 · BLS 2.8

Where All Seasons Feeders, Ltd falls in its industry

5,793 Duct work (e.g., cooling, dust establishments

Safer than 28% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #333 safest of 408 Duct work (e.g., cooling, dust employers in Texas.

All Seasons Feeders, Ltd (58 employees, TCR 5.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate All Seasons Feeders, Ltd
All Seasons Feeders, Ltd (58 employees, TCR 5.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

All Seasons Feeders, Ltd has fewer employees than the Duct work (e.g., cooling, dust collectio median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 4.8 3.2 3 0 0
2018 7.0 5.2 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · TX · San Antonio

5,793 Duct work (e.g., cooling, dust collection, exhaust, heating, ventilation) installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 2,207 employers in San Antonio, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Steg Plumbing LLC 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bismarck - H A Thompson & Sons, Inc. 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR B&I Contractors - Tampa Office 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Air Control Home Services 5.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cactus Feedyard 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE Flatonia Farm Plant 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE Waelder 2 Complex 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE Complex 1 58 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bexar County Hospital District 8,703 FTE
CITY-NEAR Legend Oaks Health & Rehabilitation West San Antonio 6,953 FTE
CITY-NEAR ISS Facility Services Inc. 6,177 FTE
CITY-NEAR Buena Vida of San Antonio 5,262 FTE
NAT-TCR ARK Las Vegas Restaurant Corp. 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Mayfield - Braselton 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR First Student, Inc. Location #20988 Phoenix 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Css Chs Union 5.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Covanta Lancaster, Inc. 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lakefront Lines Cincinnati 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Crbg, LLC 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Irving Woodlands LLC 58 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.