Roofing contractors · Alabama

All-South Subcontractors Spanish Fort

Spanish Fort, AL · ~66 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.8
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

All-South Subcontractors Spanish Fort runs at 278% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Roofing contractors workplace, earning a grade F.

All-South Subcontractors Spanish Fort: 7.8 TCR = 278% of Roofing contractors BLS 2.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

All-South Subcontractors Spanish Fort safety composite

All-South Subcontractors Spanish Fort scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

All-South Subcontractors Spanish Fort: 4.5 → 5.5 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 13.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2019

All-South Subcontractors Spanish Fort's TCR rose 1.0 from 4.5 in 2016 to 5.5 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 13.4 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238160 · Spanish Fort, AL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.8 · 278% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #13/14
  • PHOTO Dale Crampton Company
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~66 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Dale Crampton Company (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

All-South Subcontractors Spanish Fort in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows All-South Subcontractors Spanish Fort averages 7.8 TCR (278% of the Roofing contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

All-South Subcontractors Spanish Fort TCR series: 2016=4.5 · 2017=13.4 · 2019=5.5 · BLS 2.8

Where All-South Subcontractors Spanish Fort falls in its industry

1,723 Roofing contractors establishments

Safer than 20% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 14 Roofing contractors employers in Alabama.

All-South Subcontractors Spanish Fort (66 employees, TCR 7.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 3.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate All-South Subcontractors Spanish Fort
All-South Subcontractors Spanish Fort (66 employees, TCR 7.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 3.7

All-South Subcontractors Spanish Fort has more employees than the Roofing contractors median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 5.5 0.0 3 0 0
2017 13.4 7.4 9 0 0
2016 4.5 3.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238160 · AL · Spanish Fort

1,723 Roofing contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 30 employers in Spanish Fort, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Dale Crampton Company 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Curtis-McKinley Roofing & Sheet Metal Inc. 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR McEnany Roofing, Inc T 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR d-7 Roofing LLC 7.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Western Division Tuscaloosa Crew Headquarters 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE Signature Homes-Birmingham office 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE Smith Douglas Alabama 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jim Cooper Construction Company, inc. 66 FTE
CITY-NEAR ACTS Retirement-Life Communities - Westminster Village 193 FTE
CITY-NEAR ACTS Retirement-Life Communities-Westminster Village 163 FTE
CITY-NEAR Store 1400 157 FTE
CITY-NEAR D.R. Horton, Inc. - Baldwin County 151 FTE
NAT-TCR Centerra Co-op, Middlefield 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Wheeler Tunnel Plant 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 6400-Swy 0019 1078 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Cambria Care Center 7.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pposbc- Adm Sa 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE HQ 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Colonial Hill Center 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Highland Care Center of Redlands 66 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.