Fencing contractors (except electronic containment fencing for pets) · California

All Steel Fence, Inc.

Lathrop, CA · ~21 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.3
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

All Steel Fence, Inc. runs at 367% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Fencing contractors (except electronic containment fencing for pets) workplace, earning a grade F.

All Steel Fence, Inc.: 10.3 TCR = 367% of Fencing contractors (except electronic containment fencing for pets) BLS 2.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

All Steel Fence, Inc. safety composite

All Steel Fence, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−15.2

2017→2024

All Steel Fence, Inc. injury rate improved

All Steel Fence, Inc.'s TCR fell 15.2 from 15.2 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 18.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=15.2 · 2019=9.7 · 2020=4.8 · 2021=18.2 · 2022=8.6 · 2023=15.5 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238990 · Lathrop, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.3 · 367% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #157/171
  • PHOTO Keith Zars Pools
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~21 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Keith Zars Pools (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

All Steel Fence, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows All Steel Fence, Inc. averages 10.3 TCR (367% of the Fencing contractors (except electronic containment fencing for pets) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

All Steel Fence, Inc. TCR series: 2017=15.2 · 2019=9.7 · 2020=4.8 · 2021=18.2 · 2022=8.6 · 2023=15.5 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where All Steel Fence, Inc. falls in its industry

1,634 Fencing contractors (except el establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #157 safest of 171 Fencing contractors (except el employers in California.

All Steel Fence, Inc. (21 employees, TCR 10.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate All Steel Fence, Inc.
All Steel Fence, Inc. (21 employees, TCR 10.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9

All Steel Fence, Inc. has fewer employees than the Fencing contractors (except electronic c median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 15.5 11.6 4 0 0
2022 8.6 4.3 1 1 0
2021 18.2 9.1 4 0 0
2020 4.8 0.0 1 0 0
2019 9.7 4.8 2 0 0
2017 15.2 10.2 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238990 · CA · Lathrop

1,634 Fencing contractors (except electronic containment fencing for pets) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 77 employers in Lathrop, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Keith Zars Pools 10.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR K Brothers Fence, INC 10.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Leacock Paving LLC 10.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Butler Fence Co., Inc. 10.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Poso Ridge,LLC 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fonseca & Fonseca, Inc. 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE TELESIS ONION CO., INC. 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mayflower Farms Inc 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR CALAH - LATHROP HUB 1,624 FTE
CITY-NEAR LATHROP HUB (CALAH) 970 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-CA-Lathrop-Harlan Rd-Manufacturing 518 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2802_5346 516 FTE
NAT-TCR H & S Enterprise / Lincoln 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Fs-Via Christi N Rid 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Amazon Retail LLC - MAI1 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Riggenbach 10.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Millbury Ma Distribution Center 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Canastota Ny Distribution Center 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lubbock Tx Distribution Center 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Armal - Malvern Center 21 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.