Coating metals and metal products for the trade · Pennsylvania

Allegheny Coatings - Boot Jack

Ridgway, PA · ~35 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Allegheny Coatings - Boot Jack runs at 158% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Coating metals and metal products for the trade workplace, earning a grade D.

Allegheny Coatings - Boot Jack: 5.2 TCR = 158% of Coating metals and metal products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Allegheny Coatings - Boot Jack safety composite

Allegheny Coatings - Boot Jack scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 37%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−14.5

2018→2024

Allegheny Coatings - Boot Jack injury rate improved

Allegheny Coatings - Boot Jack's TCR fell 14.5 from 14.5 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 14.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=14.5 · 2019=6.5 · 2020=0.0 · 2022=3.5 · 2023=6.9 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332812 · Ridgway, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.2 · 158% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #24/45
  • PHOTO Jacksonville Plant
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Jacksonville Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Allegheny Coatings - Boot Jack in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Allegheny Coatings - Boot Jack averages 5.2 TCR (158% of the Coating metals and metal products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Allegheny Coatings - Boot Jack TCR series: 2018=14.5 · 2019=6.5 · 2020=0 · 2022=3.5 · 2023=6.9 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Allegheny Coatings - Boot Jack falls in its industry

646 Coating metals and metal produ establishments

Safer than 37% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #24 safest of 45 Coating metals and metal produ employers in Pennsylvania.

Allegheny Coatings - Boot Jack (35 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Allegheny Coatings - Boot Jack
Allegheny Coatings - Boot Jack (35 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Allegheny Coatings - Boot Jack has fewer employees than the Coating metals and metal products for th median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 6.9 0.0 2 0 0
2022 3.5 3.5 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 6.5 6.5 3 0 0
2018 14.5 8.7 3 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332812 · PA · Ridgway

646 Coating metals and metal products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 46 employers in Ridgway, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Jacksonville Plant 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR ACI Oshkosh 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Valley NE - Coatings 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ad-Tech 5.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE W.A.C. Mushrooms Inc. 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Highland Oysters 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mushroom Spawning, Inc. 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE PANTHER CREEK POWER OPERATING 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR Helpmates - Huntingdon 386 FTE
CITY-NEAR American Axle & Manufacturing Ridgway 363 FTE
CITY-NEAR Helpmates - Crawford 361 FTE
CITY-NEAR Helpmates - Warren 354 FTE
NAT-TCR Fm Acoustical Tile 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Quality Engineering Services Inc 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Nagle Leasing 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR United Enertech Corp 5.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Nichols, Long and Moore Construction Corp 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE IDA International Inc. 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE JNB Mechanical Inc. 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Foglia Education Center 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.