Pickling metals and metal products for the trade · Pennsylvania

Allegheny Surface Technology

Lewis Run, PA · ~26 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Allegheny Surface Technology runs at 141% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Pickling metals and metal products for the trade workplace, earning a grade D.

Allegheny Surface Technology: 4.7 TCR = 141% of Pickling metals and metal products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Allegheny Surface Technology safety composite

Allegheny Surface Technology scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.1

2017→2023

Allegheny Surface Technology injury rate improved

Allegheny Surface Technology's TCR fell 5.1 from 12.3 in 2017 to 7.2 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 12.3 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.77× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=12.3 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=3.8 · 2023=7.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332813 · Lewis Run, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.7 · 141% of ind

  • DART 3.6 DART
  • RANK #13/27
  • PHOTO Santa Clara Plating …
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~26 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Santa Clara Plating Co., Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Allegheny Surface Technology in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Allegheny Surface Technology averages 4.7 TCR (141% of the Pickling metals and metal products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Allegheny Surface Technology TCR series: 2017=12.3 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=3.8 · 2023=7.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Allegheny Surface Technology falls in its industry

585 Pickling metals and metal prod establishments

Safer than 41% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 27 Pickling metals and metal prod employers in Pennsylvania.

Allegheny Surface Technology (26 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Allegheny Surface Technology
Allegheny Surface Technology (26 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 4.0

Allegheny Surface Technology has fewer employees than the Pickling metals and metal products for t median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 7.2 3.6 2 0 0
2022 3.8 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 12.3 8.2 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332813 · PA · Lewis Run

585 Pickling metals and metal products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 8 employers in Lewis Run, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Santa Clara Plating Co., Inc. 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR QCP Enterprises Whittier 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Custom Manufacturing & Polishing 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pioneer Metal Finishing South Bend 4.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE JB Muhsroom Service LLC 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hamilton Liberty 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE NRG Energy Center Harrisburg LLC 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Regency at Yardley 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR Keystone Powdered Metal Company 162 FTE
CITY-NEAR Keystone Powdered Metal Company Lewis Run, PA 152 FTE
CITY-NEAR Keystone Powdered Metal - Lewis Run 152 FTE
CITY-NEAR Allegheny Bradford Corporation - SA 98 FTE
NAT-TCR The Workshop 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR McDowell NW Inc. 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR NYP Corp - NJ 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Colonial Hall Manor, INC. 4.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Macura Excavating LLC 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Grant Railway Services, Inc 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE NE Truck-NP 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE NIC Global-TN Coatings 26 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.