Intercommunication (intercom) system installation · Kentucky

Alliant Integrators Main Office

Louisville, KY · ~40 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Alliant Integrators Main Office runs at 72% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Intercommunication (intercom) system installation workplace, earning a grade B.

Alliant Integrators Main Office: 2.0 TCR = 72% of Intercommunication (intercom) system installation BLS 2.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Alliant Integrators Main Office safety composite

Alliant Integrators Main Office scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 58% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Alliant Integrators Main Office: 0.0 → 2.3 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 5.8 TCR · DART/TCR 1.13× in 2019

Alliant Integrators Main Office's TCR rose 2.3 from 0.0 in 2016 to 2.3 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 5.8 TCR. In 2019, DART was 1.13× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238210 · Louisville, KY AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 72% of ind

  • DART 2.3 DART
  • RANK #33/51
  • PHOTO Union Electric Contr…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~40 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Union Electric Contracting Company Merck Establishment (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kentucky employers → · Look up another →

Alliant Integrators Main Office in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Alliant Integrators Main Office averages 2.0 TCR (72% of the Intercommunication (intercom) system installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Alliant Integrators Main Office TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=5.8 · 2018=0 · 2019=2.3 · BLS 2.8

Where Alliant Integrators Main Office falls in its industry

4,550 Intercommunication (intercom) establishments

Safer than 58% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kentucky alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #33 safest of 51 Intercommunication (intercom) employers in Kentucky.

Alliant Integrators Main Office (40 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Alliant Integrators Main Office
Alliant Integrators Main Office (40 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Alliant Integrators Main Office has fewer employees than the Intercommunication (intercom) system ins median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 2.3 2.3 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 5.8 2.9 2 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238210 · KY · Louisville

4,550 Intercommunication (intercom) system installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,805 rated employers in Kentucky with headcount on file · 1,638 employers in Louisville, KY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Union Electric Contracting Company Merck Establishment 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Star-Lo Electric Inc. 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR BEI Oklahoma 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR TRANS 765 S. KIRKMAN RD 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Electrical Distribution Cooperative 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Leak Eliminators 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE STC:SC630 - SC630-Louisville, KY 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE STC:SC640 - SC640-Lexington, KY 40 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jefferson County Public Schools 18,524 FTE
CITY-NEAR KYGRA - WORLDPORT 11,933 FTE
CITY-NEAR WORLDPORT (KYGRA) 9,667 FTE
CITY-NEAR KTKY TRUCK 8,757 FTE
NAT-TCR Flex-A-Seal, Inc. 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Innocor Central, LLC - West Chicago 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR KIT Hudson Valley DC 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Waubun Elem & Sec Schools 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Parker Service Center - Oshkosh 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE CNB Mushroom, LLC 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Summit Metal Fabricators 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hawaii Organ Procurement Organization 40 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.