Trash collection services · Michigan

Allied Waste Services of North America

Erie, MI · ~164 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.7
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Allied Waste Services of North America runs at 103% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Trash collection services workplace, earning a grade C.

Allied Waste Services of North America: 2.7 TCR = 103% of Trash collection services BLS 2.6 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Allied Waste Services of North America safety composite

Allied Waste Services of North America scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Allied Waste Services of North America: 2.6 → 3.2 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 3.2 TCR · DART/TCR 1.01× in 2024

Allied Waste Services of North America's TCR rose 0.6 from 2.6 in 2022 to 3.2 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.01× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562111 · Erie, MI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.7 · 103% of ind

  • DART 2.7 DART
  • RANK #11/80
  • PHOTO S02881 - WM Houston …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~164 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: S02881 - WM Houston Metro (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Allied Waste Services of North America in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Allied Waste Services of North America averages 2.7 TCR (103% of the Trash collection services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Allied Waste Services of North America TCR series: 2022=2.6 · 2023=2.2 · 2024=3.2 · BLS 2.6

Where Allied Waste Services of North America falls in its industry

2,322 Trash collection services establishments

Safer than 78% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 80 Trash collection services employers in Michigan.

Allied Waste Services of North America (164 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Allied Waste Services of North America
Allied Waste Services of North America (164 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 5.1

Allied Waste Services of North America has more employees than the Trash collection services median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.2 2.7 5 1 0
2023 2.2 1.1 3 1 0
2022 2.6 2.1 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562111 · MI · Erie

2,322 Trash collection services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 8 employers in Erie, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR S02881 - WM Houston Metro 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR S04076 - Utica Hauling 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Western Elite Environmental 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gainsborough Waste 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sachse Construction 164 FTE
STATE-SIZE Zoetis GMS South 164 FTE
STATE-SIZE 464 - Pharmacy Central Fill #2 164 FTE
STATE-SIZE Great Lakes Castings LLC - Ludington 164 FTE
CITY-NEAR Republic Services 4259 139 FTE
CITY-NEAR Automatic Handling International, Inc. 127 FTE
CITY-NEAR Heidtman Steel Products Inc.-Bedford Tube Mill 111 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ort Tool and Die Corp 104 FTE
NAT-TCR Whitewood Industries, Plant 2 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Midwest Carriers 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Chartwell Wisconsin, LLC, dba UW Health Care Direct 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Hexpol Compounding LLC - Burton, OH 2.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Donaldson Company, Inc 164 FTE
NAT-SIZE Spearfish Forest Products, Inc. 164 FTE
NAT-SIZE Aristacare At Cherry Hill 164 FTE
NAT-SIZE Vector Windows Inc 164 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.