Fence installation (except electronic containment fencing for pets) · North Carolina

Allison Fence Company

Charlotte, NC · ~38 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Allison Fence Company runs at 51% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Fence installation (except electronic containment fencing for pets) workplace, earning a grade B.

Allison Fence Company: 1.4 TCR = 51% of Fence installation (except electronic containment fencing for pets) BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Allison Fence Company safety composite

Allison Fence Company scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.4

2016→2024

Allison Fence Company injury rate improved

Allison Fence Company's TCR fell 2.4 from 2.4 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 3.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.4 · 2017=2.3 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=2.1 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=2.8 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=3.4 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238990 · Charlotte, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.4 · 51% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #13/40
  • PHOTO Main
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Main (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Allison Fence Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Allison Fence Company averages 1.4 TCR (51% of the Fence installation (except electronic containment fencing for pets) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Allison Fence Company TCR series: 2016=2.4 · 2017=2.3 · 2018=0 · 2019=2.1 · 2020=0 · 2021=2.8 · 2022=0 · 2023=3.4 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Allison Fence Company falls in its industry

1,634 Fence installation (except ele establishments

Safer than 60% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 40 Fence installation (except ele employers in North Carolina.

Allison Fence Company (38 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Allison Fence Company
Allison Fence Company (38 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Allison Fence Company has fewer employees than the Fence installation (except electronic co median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 3.4 3.4 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 2.8 2.8 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.1 2.1 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 2.3 2.3 1 0 0
2016 2.4 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238990 · NC · Charlotte

1,634 Fence installation (except electronic containment fencing for pets) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 2,058 employers in Charlotte, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Main 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Riley Industrial Services, Inc. - 4 Corners 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR BrandSafway Services, LLC - Portland Branch 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Selinsky Force LLC 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Morganton Hatchery 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Harris Energy & Environmental Center 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Enerdyne Power Systems, Inc 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Electric Utilities (8100) 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1101-Carolinas Medical Center (1101) 8,444 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0001-Carolinas Medical Center 8,032 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-TRML 7,295 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Presbyterian Medical Center 4,973 FTE
NAT-TCR Plant Wansley 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Scot Forge - Spring Grove 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Artesian Water Company, Inc.- Newark Establishment 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Danville 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE R+L Carriers - ELP 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stiles Roofing Inc 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pioneer Fibers Inc. 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE PGSTL 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.