Methyl cellulose resins manufacturing · Connecticut

Allnex-Wallingford

Wallingford, CT · ~114 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Allnex-Wallingford runs at 53% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Methyl cellulose resins manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Allnex-Wallingford: 1.8 TCR = 53% of Methyl cellulose resins manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Allnex-Wallingford safety composite

Allnex-Wallingford scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 44%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.8

2016→2024

Allnex-Wallingford injury rate improved

Allnex-Wallingford's TCR fell 0.8 from 1.6 in 2016 to 0.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 5.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.47× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.6 · 2017=3.4 · 2018=1.4 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=5.2 · 2022=2.5 · 2023=0.9 · 2024=0.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325211 · Wallingford, CT AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.8 · 53% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #3/7
  • PHOTO Huntsman - Ringwood
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~114 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Huntsman - Ringwood (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

Allnex-Wallingford in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Allnex-Wallingford averages 1.8 TCR (53% of the Methyl cellulose resins manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Allnex-Wallingford TCR series: 2016=1.6 · 2017=3.4 · 2018=1.4 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=5.2 · 2022=2.5 · 2023=0.9 · 2024=0.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Allnex-Wallingford falls in its industry

644 Methyl cellulose resins manufa establishments

Safer than 52% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 7 Methyl cellulose resins manufa employers in Connecticut.

Allnex-Wallingford (114 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Allnex-Wallingford
Allnex-Wallingford (114 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Allnex-Wallingford has more employees than the Methyl cellulose resins manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2023 0.9 0.9 1 0 0
2022 2.5 1.7 3 0 0
2021 5.2 2.6 6 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 1.4 0.7 2 0 0
2017 3.4 1.1 2 1 0
2016 1.6 0.8 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325211 · CT · Wallingford

644 Methyl cellulose resins manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 136 employers in Wallingford, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Huntsman - Ringwood 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR INEOS Melamines LLC 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR USA SC Chester Plant 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Elantas PDG, Inc. 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Trelleborg Coated Systems US, Inc. dba Uretek 114 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Gilman Brothers Company 114 FTE
STATE-SIZE ELG Utica Alloys 114 FTE
STATE-SIZE AeroMed (Glastonbury Operations) - Glastonbury, CT 114 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon Transportation Services : BDL5 1,386 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gaylord Hopital 986 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - BDL5 956 FTE
CITY-NEAR DDS South Region 606 FTE
NAT-TCR Memphis 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Mark B. Whitaker WP 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Bluewater Thermal Solutions - Coldwater 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR F-S Prestress LLC Hattiesburg 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mondi 114 FTE
NAT-SIZE Northern Boiler & Mechanical Contractors, Inc. 114 FTE
NAT-SIZE Masury terminal 114 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brenham Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 114 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.